Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;5(2):10.15695/jstem/v5i2.10.
doi: 10.15695/jstem/v5i2.10. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Interprofessional Near-Peer Mentoring Teams Enhance Cancer Research Training: Sustainable Approaches for Biomedical Workforce Development of Historically Underrepresented Students

Affiliations

Interprofessional Near-Peer Mentoring Teams Enhance Cancer Research Training: Sustainable Approaches for Biomedical Workforce Development of Historically Underrepresented Students

J J Huerta et al. J STEM Outreach. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

A cancer research training program explored different approaches for staffing their in-person and virtual programs for high school students. The inclusion of undergraduate near-peer mentors had a universal benefit when implemented across in-person and virtual training programs of one- and ten-week durations. Benefits are described for four stakeholder groups: the high school trainees, program staff, scientist partners, and peer mentors themselves. Peer mentors described that their involvement enhanced their own professional development and, for some, drove a new interest in cancer research. Scientist partners described that peer mentors helped translate their work in the virtual environment for high school students. High school trainees reported their sessions with peer mentors to be one of their favorite parts of the program. Interprofessional peer mentors were highly relatable to students and modeled communication and paths in biomedical research. Staff reported that peer mentors supported student engagement during community shadowing sessions, allowing staff to focus on developing the shadowing experiences with partners. The benefit of including peer mentors was substantial from all viewpoints explored. Their intensive inclusion in cancer research training programs supports sustainability and capacity building in biomedical workforce development.

Keywords: Cultural Diversity; Disparities; Health Inequities; High School; Interpersonal Relations; Professional Development; Program Evaluation; Research Education; Scholar Research; Science Education; Undergraduate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Knight Scholars Program’s three tiers of cancer research training. Blue boxes denote research experiences for Introduction (one week), Immersion (two weeks), and Intensive programs (six weeks), with yellow blocks describing shadowing experiences throughout the state to show additional cancer perspectives.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Averill MM, Dillon-Sumner L, Stergachis A, Sconyers J, Summerside N, Brazg T, and Errett N (2019). Integrating public health students into interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 10.1080/13561820.2019.1690436 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boekeloo BO, Jones C, Bhagat K, Siddiqui J, and Wang MQ (2015). The role of intrinsic motivation in the pursuit of health science-related careers among youth from underrepresented low socioeconomic populations. Journal of Urban Health, 92(5), 980–994. 10.1007/s11524-015-9987-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castleden H, Morgan VS, and Neimanis A (2010). Researchers’ perspectives on collective/community co-authorship in community-based participatory indigenous research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(4), 23–32. - PubMed
    1. Chang MJ, Sharkness J, Hurtado S, and Newman CB (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–580. 10.1002/tea.21146 - DOI
    1. Clark Blickenstaff J (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. 10.1080/09540250500145072 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources