Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 29:52:36-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.002. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Using a Recurrent Neural Network To Inform the Use of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) and PSA Density for Dynamic Monitoring of the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression on Active Surveillance

Affiliations

Using a Recurrent Neural Network To Inform the Use of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) and PSA Density for Dynamic Monitoring of the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression on Active Surveillance

Nikita Sushentsev et al. Eur Urol Open Sci. .

Abstract

The global uptake of prostate cancer (PCa) active surveillance (AS) is steadily increasing. While prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) is an important baseline predictor of PCa progression on AS, there is a scarcity of recommendations on its use in follow-up. In particular, the best way of measuring PSAD is unclear. One approach would be to use the baseline gland volume (BGV) as a denominator in all calculations throughout AS (nonadaptive PSAD, PSADNA), while another would be to remeasure gland volume at each new magnetic resonance imaging scan (adaptive PSAD, PSADA). In addition, little is known about the predictive value of serial PSAD in comparison to PSA. We applied a long short-term memory recurrent neural network to an AS cohort of 332 patients and found that serial PSADNA significantly outperformed both PSADA and PSA for follow-up prediction of PCa progression because of its high sensitivity. Importantly, while PSADNA was superior in patients with smaller glands (BGV ≤55 ml), serial PSA was better in men with larger prostates of >55 ml.

Patient summary: Repeat measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) are the mainstay of active surveillance in prostate cancer. Our study suggests that in patients with a prostate gland of 55 ml or smaller, PSAD measurements are a better predictor of tumour progression, whereas men with a larger gland may benefit more from PSA monitoring.

Keywords: Active surveillance; Artificial intelligence; Longitudinal data; Predictive modelling; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Recurrent neural networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Use of serial PSA and PSAD for predicting prostate cancer progression on active surveillance. (A) LOWESS curves demonstrating serial changes in prostate GV, PSA, PSADA, and PSADNA for patients with and without progression. (B) ROC curves for serial PSA, PSADA, and PSADNA applied to the whole cohort to assess the ability to predict prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance. (C) ROC curves for serial PSA, PSADA, and PSADNA for patients with differing BGV. (D) LOWESS curves demonstrating changes in serial PSA and PSADNA for patients with smaller (≤55 ml) and larger (>55 ml) BGV. (E) LOWESS curves demonstrating the difference between PSADA and PSADNA by BGV. (F) Serial changes in median PSA and PSADNA for patients with smaller (≤55 ml) and larger (>55 ml) BGV. AUC = area under the ROC curve; BGV = baseline GV; GV = gland volume; LOWESS = locally weighted scatterplot smoothing; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; PSAD = PSA density (in ng/ml/ml); PSADA = adaptive PSAD; PSADNA = nonadaptive PSAD; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.

References

    1. Fletcher S.A., von Landenberg N., Cole A.P., et al. Contemporary national trends in prostate cancer risk profile at diagnosis. Prostate Cancer Prostat Dis. 2020;23:81–87. doi: 10.1038/S41391-019-0157-Y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore C.M., King L.E., Withington J., et al. Best current practice and research priorities in active surveillance for prostate cancer—a report of a Movember international consensus meeting. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.003. In press. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bangma C.H., Schoots I.G. Magnetic resonance imaging-based monitoring in active surveillance: are we ready to jump on the bandwagon? Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;38:49. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caglic I., Sushentsev N., Gnanapragasam V., et al. MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol. 2020;31:2696–2705. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07336-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giganti F., Stabile A., Stavrinides V., et al. Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort. Eur Radiol. 2020;31:1644–1655. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed