Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 26:13:1072652.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1072652. eCollection 2023.

Optimizing the structure of interdisciplinary tumor boards for effective cancer care

Affiliations

Optimizing the structure of interdisciplinary tumor boards for effective cancer care

Friederike Braulke et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Multi-professional interdisciplinary tumor boards (ITB) are essential institutions to discuss all newly diagnosed, relapsed or complex cancer patients in a team of specialists to find an optimal cancer care plan for each individual patient with regard to national and international clinical practice guidelines, patient´s preference and comorbidities. In a high-volume cancer center, entity-specific ITBs take place at least once a week discussing a large number of patients. To a high level of expertise and dedication, this also requires an enormous amount of time for physicians, cancer specialists and administrative support colleagues, especially for radiologists, pathologists, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists, who must attend all cancer-specific boards according to certification requirements.

Methods: In this 15-month prospective German single-center analysis, we examined the established structures of 12 different cancer-specific ITBs at the certified Oncology Center and demonstrate tools helping to optimize processes before, during and after the boards for optimal, time-saving procedures.

Results: By changing pathways, introducing revised registration protocols and new digital supports we could show that the workload of preparation by radiologists and pathologists could be reduced significantly by 22.9% (p=<0.0001) and 52.7% (p=<0.0001), respectively. Furthermore, two questions were added to all registration forms about the patient´s need for specialized palliative care support that should lead to more awareness and early integration of specialized help.

Discussion: There are several ways to reduce the workload of all ITB team members while maintaining high quality recommendations and adherence to national and international guidelines.

Keywords: multi-professional tumor boards; pathology; radio-oncology; radiology; specialized palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AS has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche; has consultancy or advisory roles for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche; and has received travel support from BMS. CK is a member of the advisory board for BI, Roche, Bayer, and Novartis. K-MT has received honoraria from BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, LEO, Almirall, Galderma, and Candela; has consultancy or advisory roles for BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, LEO, and Almirall; and has received travel support from BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and LEO. MH is part of the advisory board for AstraZeneca, Roche, and BMS. JuG has received lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche Diagnostics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interdisciplinary tumor boards: (A) the mean number of cases discussed per board meeting across 12 ITBs (total n = 7,123) between March 2021 and January 2022; (B) the median duration of interdisciplinary tumor board meetings (min). The gray area represents pointwise 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cases prepared in detail for presentation at interdisciplinary tumor boards by radiologists (A) and pathologists (B) between March 2021 and January 2022. The gray area represents pointwise 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Ganesan P, Kumar L, Hariprasad R, Gupta A, Dawar R, Vijayaraghavan M. Improving care in ovarian cancer: the role of a clinico-pathological meeting. Natl Med J India. (2008) 21(5):225–7. doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.16542 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Dunlop DJ. An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer (2005) 93(9):977–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602825 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, Roubidoux MA, Chang AE, Kleer CG, et al. . Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer (2006) 107(10):2346–51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22266 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blay JY, Soibinet P, Penel N, Bompas E, Duffaud F, Stoeckle E, et al. . Improved survival using specialized multidisciplinary board in sarcoma patients. Ann Oncol (2017) 28(11):2852–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx484 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurpad R, Kim W, Rathmell WK, Godley P, Whang Y, Fielding J, et al. . A multidisciplinary approach to the management of urologic malignancies: does it influence diagnostic and treatment decisions? Urol Oncol (2011) 29(4):378–82. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.04.008 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources