Optimizing the structure of interdisciplinary tumor boards for effective cancer care
- PMID: 37182140
- PMCID: PMC10171921
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1072652
Optimizing the structure of interdisciplinary tumor boards for effective cancer care
Abstract
Introduction: Multi-professional interdisciplinary tumor boards (ITB) are essential institutions to discuss all newly diagnosed, relapsed or complex cancer patients in a team of specialists to find an optimal cancer care plan for each individual patient with regard to national and international clinical practice guidelines, patient´s preference and comorbidities. In a high-volume cancer center, entity-specific ITBs take place at least once a week discussing a large number of patients. To a high level of expertise and dedication, this also requires an enormous amount of time for physicians, cancer specialists and administrative support colleagues, especially for radiologists, pathologists, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists, who must attend all cancer-specific boards according to certification requirements.
Methods: In this 15-month prospective German single-center analysis, we examined the established structures of 12 different cancer-specific ITBs at the certified Oncology Center and demonstrate tools helping to optimize processes before, during and after the boards for optimal, time-saving procedures.
Results: By changing pathways, introducing revised registration protocols and new digital supports we could show that the workload of preparation by radiologists and pathologists could be reduced significantly by 22.9% (p=<0.0001) and 52.7% (p=<0.0001), respectively. Furthermore, two questions were added to all registration forms about the patient´s need for specialized palliative care support that should lead to more awareness and early integration of specialized help.
Discussion: There are several ways to reduce the workload of all ITB team members while maintaining high quality recommendations and adherence to national and international guidelines.
Keywords: multi-professional tumor boards; pathology; radio-oncology; radiology; specialized palliative care.
Copyright © 2023 Braulke, Kober, Arndt, Papendick, Strauss, Kramm, Thoms, König, Gaedcke, Gallwas, Wulf, Szuszies, Wulf, Rödel, Wolfer, Malinova, Overbeck, Hinterthaner, Lotz, Nauck, Ernst, Stadelmann, Ströbel, Ellenrieder, Asendorf and Rieken.
Conflict of interest statement
AS has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche; has consultancy or advisory roles for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche; and has received travel support from BMS. CK is a member of the advisory board for BI, Roche, Bayer, and Novartis. K-MT has received honoraria from BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, LEO, Almirall, Galderma, and Candela; has consultancy or advisory roles for BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, LEO, and Almirall; and has received travel support from BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and LEO. MH is part of the advisory board for AstraZeneca, Roche, and BMS. JuG has received lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche Diagnostics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
