Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 25;13(1):6718.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30177-y.

Global conservation prioritization for the Orchidaceae

Affiliations

Global conservation prioritization for the Orchidaceae

Pati Vitt et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Quantitative assessments of endemism, evolutionary distinctiveness and extinction threat underpin global conservation prioritization for well-studied taxa, such as birds, mammals, and amphibians. However, such information is unavailable for most of the world's taxa. This is the case for the Orchidaceae, a hyperdiverse and cosmopolitan family with incomplete phylogenetic and threat information. To define conservation priorities, we present a framework based on phylogenetic and taxonomic measures of distinctiveness and rarity based on the number of regions and the area of occupancy. For 25,434 orchid species with distribution data (89.3% of the Orchidaceae), we identify the Neotropics as hotspots for richness, New Guinea as a hotspot for evolutionary distinctiveness, and several islands that contain many rare and distinct species. Orchids have a similar proportion of monotypic genera as other Angiosperms, however, more taxonomically distinct orchid species are found in a single region. We identify 278 species in need of immediate conservation actions and find that more than 70% of these do not currently have an IUCN conservation assessment and are not protected in ex-situ collections at Botanical Gardens. Our study highlights locations and orchid species in urgent need of conservation and demonstrates a framework that can be applied to other data-deficient taxa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
World maps highlighting centres of orchid (A) endemic species richness (B) evolutionary distinctness (C) evolutionary distinctness based on the range size of species (D) evolutionary distinctiveness based on the number of regions species occupy. All calculations, maps and other graphics were created using R 3.5.1, R Core Team. R software: Version 3.5.1. R Found. Stat. Comput. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Histogram showing the proportion of orchids and Angiosperm species (excluding orchids) that are located in a given number of geographic regions. (B) Histogram showing the proportion of monotypic orchid genera that are located in a given number of geographic regions. (C) World map highlighting centres of monotypic orchid species richness. All calculations, maps and other graphics were created using R 3.5.1, R Core Team. R software: Version 3.5.1. R Found. Stat. Comput. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7.
Figure 3
Figure 3
World maps highlighting centres of priority species based on several metric scores: (A) evolutionary distinctness rarity based on the number of regions species occupy (ED_Regions), (B) evolutionary distinctness rarity based on the range size of species (ED_Range), (C) monotypic genera and rarity based on the number of regions species occupy, and (D) monotypic genera and rarity based on the range size of species. All calculations, maps and other graphics were created using R 3.5.1, R Core Team. R software: Version 3.5.1. R Found. Stat. Comput. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overview of the 278 priority orchid species, including growth form, habitat, altitude, and pollination syndrome.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Proportion of orchid species with IUCN assessments. (B) Proportion of orchid species found in botanic garden collections globally.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Myers N, Mittermeler RA, Mittermeler CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brooks TM, et al. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science (80-). 2006;313:58–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1127609. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myers N. Biodiversity hotspots revisited. Bioscience. 2003;53:916. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0916:BHR]2.0.CO;2. - DOI
    1. Faith DP. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biology. 1992;61:1–10.
    1. Purvis A, Agapow PM, Gittleman JL, Mace GM. Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science (80-). 2000;288:328–330. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5464.328. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types