Instructional Design Made Easy! Instructional Design Models, Categories, Frameworks, Educational Context, and Recommendations for Future Work
- PMID: 37185907
- PMCID: PMC10137401
- DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe13040054
Instructional Design Made Easy! Instructional Design Models, Categories, Frameworks, Educational Context, and Recommendations for Future Work
Abstract
Educators and course designers may face great hurdles when designing courses if they include an online setting. Instructional design (ID) has played a vital role as a change agent in facilitating the pedagogical and technological transformation of educators and students. However, some instructors still find ID challenging and there are information gaps regarding instructional design models, categories, educational context, and recommendations for future work. This systematic literature review (SLR) analyzed 31 publications using PRISMA to address this gap. The results of this review suggest combining ID models with broader theoretical frameworks. Investigations and research on ID should include a bigger number of ID types. It is highly recommended that extra frameworks be added to the ID procedure. To explore and grasp all parties engaged in ID, including the role of the instructor, the ID designer, and the student, it is important for additional educational contexts to be amalgamated. For novices in the field, such as graduate students, it is crucial to pay close attention to the several phases and techniques of ID. This review sheds light on the trends, future agenda, and research requirements associated with ID in educational settings. It might serve as a basis for future research on ID in educational contexts.
Keywords: course design; designing instruction; instructional design; instructional technology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Abuhassna H., Al-Rahmi W.M., Yahya N., Zakaria M.A.Z.M., Kosnin A.B.M., Darwish M. Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High Educ. 2020;17:38. doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z. - DOI
-
- Kamal A. UNICEF Education COVID-19 (Case Study—Empowering Teachers to Deliver Blended Learning after School Reopening 8 July 2020) UNICEF; New York, NY, USA: 2020. UNICEF Education COVID-19 Case Study; pp. 1–3.
-
- Vaill A.L., Testori P.A. Orientation, mentoring and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 2012;16:111–119. doi: 10.24059/olj.v16i2.256. - DOI
-
- Northcote M., Gosselin K.P., Reynaud D., Kilgour P., Anderson M. Navigating learning journeys of online teachers: Threshold concepts and self-efficacy. Issues Educ. Res. 2015;25:319–344.
-
- Scoppio G., Luyt I. Mind the gap: Enabling online faculty and instructional designers in mapping new models for quality online courses. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2017;22:725–746. doi: 10.1007/s10639-015-9452-y. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
