Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;14(2):321-325.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767680. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Challenges of Integrating APOL1 Genetic Test Results into the Electronic Health Record

Affiliations

Challenges of Integrating APOL1 Genetic Test Results into the Electronic Health Record

Luke V Rasmussen et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Integrating genetic test results into the electronic health record (EHR) is essential for integrating genetic testing into clinical practice. This article describes the organizational challenges of integrating discrete apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic test results into the EHR for a research study on culturally sensitive genetic counseling for living kidney donors.

Methods: We convened a multidisciplinary team across three institutions (Northwestern University, Northwestern Memorial HealthCare [NMHC], and OHSU Knight Diagnostic Laboratories [KDL]), including researchers, physicians, clinical information technology, and project management. Through a series of meetings over a year between the team and the genetic testing laboratory, we explored and adjusted our EHR integration plan based on regulatory and budgetary constraints.

Results: Our original proposal was to transmit results from KDL to NMHC as structured data sent via Health Level Seven (HL7) v2 message. This was ultimately deemed infeasible given the time and resources required to establish the interface, and the low number of samples to be processed for the study (n = 316). We next explored the use of Epic's Care Everywhere interoperability platform, but learned it was not possible as a laboratory test ordered for a research study; even though our intent was to study the APOL1 genetic test result's clinical use and impact, test results were still considered "research results." Faced with two remaining options-downloading a PDF from the KDL laboratory portal or scanning a faxed result from KDL-only a PDF of the APOL1 test result could be integrated into the EHR, reinforcing the status quo.

Conclusion: Even with early and ongoing stakeholder engagement, dedicated project management, and funding, unanticipated implementation challenges-especially for research projects-can result in drastic design tradeoffs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G. H., S. McCabe, and S. Moore are employees of Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, which provided APOL1 genetic testing services for this study. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.

References

    1. Marsolo K. Informatics and operations--let's get integrated. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(01):122–124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welch B M, Eilbeck K, Del Fiol G, Meyer L J, Kawamoto K. Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data with clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform. 2014;51:3–7. - PubMed
    1. Masys D R, Jarvik G P, Abernethy N F. Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data into Electronic Health Records. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(03):419–422. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kho A N, Rasmussen L V, Connolly J J. Practical challenges in integrating genomic data into the electronic health record. Genet Med. 2013;15(10):772–778. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohno-Machado L, Kim J, Gabriel R A, Kuo G M, Hogarth M A.Genomics and electronic health record systems Hum Mol Genet 201827(R1):R48–R55. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types