Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Aug;64(8):1185-1199.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13803. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Subjective and objective experiences of childhood adversity: a meta-analysis of their agreement and relationships with psychopathology

Emma R Francis  1 , Anna Tsaligopoulou  1   2 , Sarah E Stock  1   3 , Jean-Baptiste Pingault  1   4 , Jessie R Baldwin  1   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Subjective and objective experiences of childhood adversity: a meta-analysis of their agreement and relationships with psychopathology

Emma R Francis et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Researchers use both subjective self-report and objective measures, such as official records, to investigate the impact of childhood adversity on psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether subjective and objective measures of childhood adversity (a) show agreement, and (b) differentially predict psychopathology.

Method: To address this, we conducted a pre-registered meta-analysis to examine the agreement between subjective and objective measures of childhood adversity, and their prediction of psychopathology. We searched in PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase for articles with both subjective measures (self-reports) and objective measures of childhood adversity (comprising official records, or reports from multiple informants unrelated to the target individual), and measures of psychopathology.

Results: We identified 22 studies (n = 18,163) with data on agreement between subjective and objective measures of childhood adversities, and 17 studies (n = 14,789) with data on the associations between subjective and objective measures with psychopathology. First, we found that subjective and objective measures of childhood adversities were only moderately correlated (e.g. for maltreatment, r = .32, 95% CI = 0.23-0.41). Second, subjective measures of childhood adversities were associated with psychopathology, independent of objective measures (e.g. for maltreatment, r = .16, 95% CI = 0.09-0.22). In contrast, objective measures of childhood adversities had null or minimal associations with psychopathology, independent of subjective measures (e.g. r for maltreatment = .06, 95% CI = -0.02-0.13).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the effects of childhood adversity on psychopathology are primarily driven by a person's subjective experience. If this is the case, clinical interventions targeting memories and cognitive processes surrounding childhood adversity may reduce the risk of psychopathology in exposed individuals.

Keywords: Childhood adversity; meta-analysis; objective measures; psychopathology; subjective measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot for studies examining the correlation between subjective and objective measures of childhood maltreatment
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for studies examining the correlation between subjective and objective measures of bullying victimisation
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta‐analytic associations between subjective measures of child maltreatment and psychopathology, independent of objective measures (Panel A), and objective measures of child maltreatment and psychopathology, independent of subjective measures (Panel B)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Meta‐analytic associations between subjective measures of bullying victimisation and psychopathology, independent of objective measures (Panel A), and objective measures of bullying victimisation and psychopathology, independent of subjective measures (Panel B)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Armitage, J.M. , Morneau‐Vaillancourt, G. , Pingault, J.B. , Andlauer, T.F. , Paquin, S. , Langevin, S. , & Boivin, M. (2022). A multi‐informant and multi‐polygenic approach to understanding predictors of peer victimisation in childhood and adolescence. JCPP Advances, 2, e12063. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assink, M. , & Wibbelink, C.J.M. (2016). Fitting three‐level meta‐analytic models in R: A step‐by‐step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12, 154–174.
    1. Baldwin, J. , & Esposti, M.D. (2021). Triangulating evidence on the role of perceived versus objective experiences of childhood adversity in psychopathology. JCPP Advances, 1, e12010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldwin, J.R. , Reuben, A. , Newbury, J.B. , & Danese, A. (2019). Agreement between prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Psychiatry, 76, 584–593. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck, A.T. (2008). The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 969–977. - PubMed

Publication types