Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 1;9(5):e16009.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16009. eCollection 2023 May.

Quantifying vocabulary learning belief and strategy - A validation study of the Vietnamese version of Gu's (2018) vocabulary learning questionnaire

Affiliations

Quantifying vocabulary learning belief and strategy - A validation study of the Vietnamese version of Gu's (2018) vocabulary learning questionnaire

Nguyen Huynh Trang et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Background: The field of language teaching and learning has long recognized the role of vocabulary knowledge in all aspects of language proficiency and indicated that vocabulary beliefs and learning strategies play a pivotal role in learners' vocabulary development. As a result, understanding learners' beliefs and strategies in vocabulary learning is of paramount importance to language teachers. The Vocabulary Learning Questionnaire (VLQ) developed by Peter Gu in 2018 could be considered the most recent, validated instrument for the measurement of vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies. However, the VLQ contains too many items and is only available in English. The objectives of the study, therefore, are (1) to develop and validate a Vietnamese version of the VLQ which can exclude construct-irrelevant noises related to L2 comprehension, and (2) to reduce the number of items while retaining the key factors in the instruments.

Methods: 722 Vietnamese university students took part in the study. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were examined with the free software Jamovi 2.3.13. Both Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were employed to evaluate the factors' internal consistency.

Results: Separate EFAs confirmed the two dimensions of vocabulary beliefs, explaining 62.6% of the total variance, and seven factors of vocabulary strategies, predicting 72.1% of the total variance. CFAs confirmed the hypothesized 9-dimensional structures of different vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies and offer cross-validation evidence for the Vietnamese VLQ. Reliability metrics demonstrated acceptable internal reliability for vocabulary belief and strategy sub-scales.

Conclusion: The Vietnamese VLQ provides a validated measure of vocabulary beliefs and strategies. The 30-item version of the Vietnamese VLQ serves as a starting point for future research in the field of vocabulary learning and teaching in Vietnam.

Keywords: Confirmatory factor analyses; Exploratory factor analyses; Structural equation modeling; Vocabulary learning beliefs; Vocabulary learning strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Vocabulary learning beliefs. *Note: VLB = Vocabulary Learning Belief; Bl1.3–2.4 = Belief1.3–2.4.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Vocabulary learning strategies. *Note: VLS = Vocabulary Learning Strategy; Actv1-4 = Active 1-4; En3.1–3.3 = Encode3.1–3.3; Rh3.1–3.3 = Rehear3.1–3.3; Nt1.1–1.3 = Note1.1–1.3; Infr1-5 = Infer1-5; Mt1.1–1.3 = Meta1.1–1.3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A hierarchical model of vocabulary learning strategy and vocabulary learning belief.

References

    1. Nation I.S.P. second ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2013. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. - DOI
    1. Chen J., Matthews J., Lange K., McLean S. Aural single-word and aural phrasal verb knowledge and their relationships to L2 listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, Early View. 2022 doi: 10.1002/tesq.3137. - DOI
    1. Ha H.T. Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Lang. Test. Asia. 2021;11(20) doi: 10.1186/s40468-021-00131-8. - DOI
    1. Cheng J., Matthews J. The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Lang. Test. 2018;35(1):3–25. doi: 10.1177/0265532216676851. - DOI
    1. Matthews J., Cheng J. Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System. 2015;52:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.04.015. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources