From Universal Health Coverage services packages to budget appropriation: the long journey to implementation
- PMID: 37188361
- PMCID: PMC10186405
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010755
From Universal Health Coverage services packages to budget appropriation: the long journey to implementation
Abstract
Essential packages of health services (EPHS) potentially contribute to universal health coverage (UHC) financing through several pathways. Generally, expectations on what an EPHS can achieve for health financing are high, yet stakeholders rarely spell out mechanisms to reach desired outcomes. This paper analyses how EPHS relate to the three health financing functions (revenue raising, risk pooling and purchasing) and to public financial management (PFM). Our review of country experiences found that using EPHS to directly leverage funds for health has rarely been effective. Indirectly, EPHS can translate into increased revenue through fiscal measures, including health taxes. Through improved dialogue with public finance authorities, health policy-makers can use EPHS or health benefit packages to communicate the value of additional public spending connected with UHC indicators. Overall, however, empirical evidence on EPHS contribution to resource mobilisation is still pending. EPHS development exercises have been more successful in advancing resource pooling across different schemes: EPHS can help comparing performance of coverage schemes, occasionally leading to harmonisation of UHC interventions and identifying gaps between health financing and service delivery. EPHS development and iterative revisions play an essential role in core strategic purchasing activities as countries develop their health technology assessment capacity. Ultimately, packages need to translate into adequate public financing appropriations through country health programme design, ensuring funding flows directly address obstacles to increased coverage.
Keywords: Health economics; Health policies and all other topics; Health policy; Health services research; Health systems.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: This paper is part of a series of seven papers to be published as a supplement coordinated by the DCP3 Country Translation project at the LSHTM, which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Figures





References
-
- World Health Organization . Public spending on health: a closer look at global trends. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
-
- Cotlear D, Nagpal S, Smith O, et al. Going universal: how 24 developing countries are implementing universal health coverage from the bottom up. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; Sep 28, 2015. - DOI
-
- Glassman A, Giedion U, Smith PC. What’s in, what’s out: designing benefits for universal health coverage. Washington DC: Center for Global Development; 2017.
-
- Ben Mesmia H, Chtioui R, Ben Rejeb M. The tunisian societal dialogue for health reform (a qualitative study) European Journal of Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_5) doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1393. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources