Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 15;24(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00910-3.

Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare - a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations

Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare - a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mirjam Faissner et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Mental healthcare users and patients were described as a particularly vulnerable group in the debate on the burdens of the COVID-19 pandemic. Just what this means and what normative conclusions can be derived from it depend to a large extent on the underlying concept of vulnerability. While a traditional understanding locates vulnerability in the characteristics of social groups, a situational and dynamic approach considers how social structures produce vulnerable social positions. The situation of users and patients in different psychosocial settings during the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet been comprehensively considered and ethically analyzed under the aspect of situational vulnerability.

Methods: We present the results of a retrospective qualitative analysis of a survey of ethical challenges in different mental healthcare facilities of a large regional mental healthcare provider in Germany. We evaluate them ethically using a dynamic and situational understanding of vulnerability.

Results: Difficulties in implementing infection prevention measures, restrictions of mental health services in favor of infection prevention, social isolation, negative health effects on mental healthcare users and patients, and challenges in implementing regulations on state and provider levels within the local specificities emerged across different mental healthcare settings as ethically salient topics.

Conclusions: Applying a situational and dynamic understanding of vulnerability allows the identification of specific factors and conditions that have contributed to an increased context-dependent vulnerability for mental healthcare users and patients. These factors and conditions should be considered on the level of state and local regulations to reduce and address vulnerability.

Keywords: Discrimination; Mental healthcare; Organizational ethics; Psychiatry; Vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Adorjan K, Gaudernack D, Beer J, von Massenbach C, Falkai P, Pollmächer T, et al. [Coercive measures and the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic] Nervenarzt. 2021;92(5):501–6. doi: 10.1007/s00115-020-01002-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown C, Ruck Keene A, Hooper CR, O’Brien A. Isolation of patients in psychiatric hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ethical, legal, and practical challenge. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020;101572. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Unützer J, Kimmel RJ, Snowden M. Psychiatry in the age of COVID-19. World Psychiatry. 2020;19(2):130–1. doi: 10.1002/wps.20766. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stewart DE, Appelbaum PS. COVID-19 and psychiatrists’ responsibilities: a WPA position paper. World Psychiatry. 2020;19(3):406–7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20803. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardenas J, Roach J, Kopelowicz A. Prevalence of COVID 19 positive cases presenting to a psychiatric emergency room. Community Ment Health J. 2021;57(7):1240–3. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00816-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types