Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 May 15;27(1):188.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04478-7.

Objective and subjective cognition in survivors of COVID-19 one year after ICU discharge: the role of demographic, clinical, and emotional factors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Objective and subjective cognition in survivors of COVID-19 one year after ICU discharge: the role of demographic, clinical, and emotional factors

Marta Godoy-González et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) COVID-19 survivors may present long-term cognitive and emotional difficulties after hospital discharge. This study aims to characterize the neuropsychological dysfunction of COVID-19 survivors 12 months after ICU discharge, and to study whether the use of a measure of perceived cognitive deficit allows the detection of objective cognitive impairment. We also explore the relationship between demographic, clinical and emotional factors, and both objective and subjective cognitive deficits.

Methods: Critically ill COVID-19 survivors from two medical ICUs underwent cognitive and emotional assessment one year after discharge. The perception of cognitive deficit and emotional state was screened through self-rated questionnaires (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Davidson Trauma Scale), and a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation was carried out. Demographic and clinical data from ICU admission were collected retrospectively.

Results: Out of eighty participants included in the final analysis, 31.3% were women, 61.3% received mechanical ventilation and the median age of patients was 60.73 years. Objective cognitive impairment was observed in 30% of COVID-19 survivors. The worst performance was detected in executive functions, processing speed and recognition memory. Almost one in three patients manifested cognitive complaints, and 22.5%, 26.3% and 27.5% reported anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, respectively. No significant differences were found in the perception of cognitive deficit between patients with and without objective cognitive impairment. Gender and PTSD symptomatology were significantly associated with perceived cognitive deficit, and cognitive reserve with objective cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: One-third of COVID-19 survivors suffered objective cognitive impairment with a frontal-subcortical dysfunction 12 months after ICU discharge. Emotional disturbances and perceived cognitive deficits were common. Female gender and PTSD symptoms emerged as predictive factors for perceiving worse cognitive performance. Cognitive reserve emerged as a protective factor for objective cognitive functioning.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04422444; June 9, 2021.

Keywords: Cognition; Cognitive reserve; Intensive care; PICS; Post-traumatic stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart representing the distribution of the sample during the different phases of the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cognitive profile of patients with and without objective cognitive deficit according to the criteria of Jackson et al. [34]. The seven cognitive indexes are represented in each group. Z-scores below − 1.5 standard deviations (SD) are considered as moderate impairment while z-scores below − 2 SD are considered as severe impairment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Discriminant analysis of Objective Cognition (OC) and Subjective Cognition (SC): Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed for the discriminant analysis of OC and SC. The area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.593, indicating that the subjective cognitive measurement (PDQ) did not discriminate well between the groups of patients with and without impaired OC according to the criteria of Jackson et al. [34]

References

    1. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502–509. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marra A, Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Patel MB, Hughes CG, Jackson JC, et al. Co-occurrence of post-intensive care syndrome problems among 406 survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):1393–1401. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003218. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inoue S, Hatakeyama J, Kondo Y, Hifumi T, Sakuramoto H, Kawasaki T, et al. Post-intensive care syndrome: its pathophysiology, prevention, and future directions. Acute Med Surg. 2019;6(3):233–246. doi: 10.1002/ams2.415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mikkelsen ME, Still M, Anderson BJ, Bienvenu OJ, Brodsky MB, Brummel N, et al. Society of critical care medicine’s international consensus conference on prediction and identification of long-term impairments after critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(11):1670–9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004586. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang J, Jeong YJ, Hong J. The effect of postintensive care syndrome on the quality of life of intensive care unit survivors: a secondary analysis. Aust Crit Care. 2021;34(3):246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.08.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data