Digital outcome measures in pulmonary clinical trials
- PMID: 37191175
- DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000972
Digital outcome measures in pulmonary clinical trials
Abstract
Purpose of review: We highlight recent advances in the development and use of digital outcome measures in clinical trials, focusing on how to select the appropriate technology, use digital data to define trial endpoints, and glean important lessons from current experiences with digital outcome measures in pulmonary medicine.
Recent findings: A review of emerging literature demonstrates that the use of digital health technologies, particularly pulse oximeters, remote spirometers, accelerometers, and Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes, has surged in both pulmonary practice and clinical trials. Lessons learned from their use can help researchers to design the next generation of clinical trials leveraging digital outcomes to improve health.
Summary: In pulmonary diseases, digital health technologies provide validated, reliable, and usable data on patients in real-world environments. More broadly, digital endpoints have accelerated innovation in clinical trial design, improved clinical trial efficiency, and centered patients. As investigators adopt digital health technologies, it is important to follow a framework informed by both the opportunities and challenges of digitization. Successful use of digital health technologies will transform clinical trials by improving accessibility, efficiency, patient-centricity, and expanding opportunities for personalized medicine.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Farrand E, Anstrom KJ, Bernard G, et al. Closing the evidence gap in interstitial lung disease. The promise of real-world data. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 199:1061–1065.
-
- US Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Silver Spring, MD: National Institutes of Health (US), Bethesda (MD); 2016.
-
- Byrom B, Watson C, Doll H, et al. Selection of and evidentiary considerations for wearable devices and their measurements for use in regulatory decision making: recommendations from the ePRO Consortium. Value Health 2018; 21:631–639.
-
- Izmailova ES, Wagner JA, Perakslis ED. Wearable devices in clinical trials: hype and hypothesis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018; 104:42–52.
-
- Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7:283rv3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
