Identification of psychological flexibility and inflexibility profiles during the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 37192495
- DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23536
Identification of psychological flexibility and inflexibility profiles during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Background: The first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave and lockdown adversely affected the lives of people in diverse ways.
Aims: This study used a person-centered approach to identify patterns of engagement in the 12 psychological flexibility (PF) and inflexibility (PI) processes to manage the first COVID-19 wave and lockdown hardships.
Materials & methods: A total of 1035 Italian adults completed an online survey.
Results: Latent profile analyses conducted on the 12 PI/PF processes measured by the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory identified five profiles; three reflected gradations of high to low PF with corresponding inverse levels of PI, while two represented more complex relationships between PI and PF. After controlling for relevant socio-demographic and COVID-19/lockdown factors, the five profiles differed in mental health (depression, anxiety, and COVID-19 distress). Essentially a gradient of progressive decreases in all PI processes (except experiential avoidance) corresponded with increments in mental health across all profiles. Two profiles, which evidenced the highest levels of mental health (highly flexible and moderately flexible profiles), also had the greatest proportion of the sample 56.42% (n = 584), and the highest levels of PF and experiential avoidance.
Discussion: Findings from this and similar studies suggest intersecting complex relationships among the PI/PF processes that are likely to shift in response to changing contexts. We suggest this network of relationships is better represented by a three-dimensional PF/PI hexaflex than a simplistic two-dimensional depiction of the model.
Conclusion: Distinguishing different PF/PI profiles identified groups most at risk for the adverse mental health impacts of the pandemic and exposed variations in the mental health protective and risk roles of PF and PI processes, respectively, that can inform ACT-based mental health promotion interventions.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; hexaflex; latent profile analysis; mental health; psychological flexibility; psychological inflexibility.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
The trajectories of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic and the protective role of psychological flexibility: A four-wave longitudinal study.J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 15;307:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.067. Epub 2022 Apr 1. J Affect Disord. 2022. PMID: 35378147 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 and processes of adjustment in people with persistent pain: the role of psychological flexibility.Scand J Pain. 2023 Feb 14;23(3):539-545. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0138. Print 2023 Jul 26. Scand J Pain. 2023. PMID: 36779299
-
The moderating roles of psychological flexibility and inflexibility on the mental health impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown in Italy.J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020 Jul;17:109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 20. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020. PMID: 32834969 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological flexibility in older adulthood: a scoping review.Aging Ment Health. 2023 Mar;27(3):453-465. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2036948. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Aging Ment Health. 2023. PMID: 35168415 Free PMC article.
-
Defining and measuring "psychological flexibility": A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives.Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;84:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101973. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021. PMID: 33550157
Cited by
-
A Single-Session Process-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Combined with Multimodal Rehabilitation Treatment for Chronic Pain Associated with Emotional Disorders.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;14(4):327. doi: 10.3390/bs14040327. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38667123 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Amerio, A., Lugo, A., Stival, C., Fanucchi, T., Gorini, G., Pacifici, R., Odone, A., Serafini, G., & Gallus, S. (2021). COVID-19 lockdown impact on mental health in a large representative sample of Italian adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 292, 398-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.117
-
- Asmundson, G. J. G., & Taylor, S. (2020). How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: what all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 71, 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102211
-
- Azadfar, Z., Abdollahi, A., Patra, I., Chang, Y.-P., Alghazali, T., & Talib, S. G. (2022). The Iranian form of psychometric properties of the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory. Psicologia, Reflexao e Critica: Revista Semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 35(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00236-w
-
- Berlin, K. S., Williams, N. A., & Parra, G. R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst084
-
- Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous