Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 16;9(1):37.
doi: 10.1038/s41526-023-00279-y.

Ocular conditions and injuries, detection and management in spaceflight

Affiliations
Review

Ocular conditions and injuries, detection and management in spaceflight

Elana Meer et al. NPJ Microgravity. .

Abstract

Ocular trauma or other ocular conditions can be significantly debilitating in space. A literature review of over 100 articles and NASA evidence books, queried for eye related trauma, conditions, and exposures was conducted. Ocular trauma and conditions during NASA space missions during the Space Shuttle Program and ISS through Expedition 13 in 2006 were reviewed. There were 70 corneal abrasions, 4 dry eyes, 4 eye debris, 5 complaints of ocular irritation, 6 chemical burns, and 5 ocular infections noted. Unique exposures on spaceflight, such as foreign bodies, including celestial dust, which may infiltrate the habitat and contact the ocular surface, as well as chemical and thermal injuries due to prolonged CO2 and heat exposure were reported. Diagnostic modalities used to evaluate the above conditions in space flight include vision questionnaires, visual acuity and Amsler grid testing, fundoscopy, orbital ultrasound, and ocular coherence tomography. Several types of ocular injuries and conditions, mostly affecting the anterior segment, are reported. Further research is necessary to understand the greatest ocular risks that astronauts face and how better we can prevent, but also diagnose and treat these conditions in space.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fogleman, G., Leveton, L. & Charles, J. B. The Bioastronautics Roadmap: A Risk Reduction Strategy for Human Exploration. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2005-2526 (2005). - DOI
    1. Valinia A. et al. Safe Human Expeditions Beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). http://www.sti.nasa.gov (2022).
    1. Antonsen E. L. Human System Risk Management Plan—NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). Human System Risk Board.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205008887 (2020).
    1. Antonsen E. et al. Evidence Report: Risk of Adverse Health Outcomes and Decrements in Performance due to In-Flight Medical Conditions Human Research Program Exploration Medical Capabilities Element Approved for Public Release. https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/reports/Medical.PDF (2017).
    1. Lee AG, et al. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) and the neuro-ophthalmologic effects of microgravity: a review and an update. NPJ Microgravity. 2020;6:7. doi: 10.1038/s41526-020-0097-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed