Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 May 16;23(1):898.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15806-5.

SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention and control measures in Belgian schools between December 2020 and June 2021 and their association with seroprevalence: a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention and control measures in Belgian schools between December 2020 and June 2021 and their association with seroprevalence: a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study

Milena Callies et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: To protect school-aged children from the potential consequences of a new viral infection, public health authorities recommended to implement infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in school settings. Few studies evaluated the implementation of these measures and their effect on SARS-CoV-2 infection rates among pupils and staff. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in Belgian schools and assess its relation to the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among pupils and staff.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in a representative sample of primary and secondary schools in Belgium between December 2020 and June 2021. The implementation of IPC measures in schools was assessed using a questionnaire. Schools were classified according to their compliance with the implementation of IPC measures as 'poor', 'moderate' or 'thorough'. Saliva samples were collected from pupils and staff to determine the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. To assess the association between the strength of implementation of IPC measures and SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among pupils and staff, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the data collected in December 2020/January 2021.

Results: A variety of IPC measures (ventilation, hygiene and physical distancing) was implemented by more than 60% of schools, with most attention placed on hygiene measures. In January 2021, poor implementation of IPC measures was associated with an increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence among pupils from 8.6% (95%CI: 4.5 - 16.6) to 16.7% (95%CI: 10.2 - 27.4) and staff from 11.5% (95%CI: 8.1 - 16.4) to 17.6% (95%CI: 11.5 - 27.0). This association was only statistically significant for the assessment of all IPC measures together in the population comprised of pupils and staff.

Conclusions: Belgian schools were relatively compliant with recommended IPC measures at the school level. Higher SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among pupils and staff was found in schools with poor implementation of IPC measures, compared to schools with thorough implementation.

Trial registration: This trial is registered under the NCT04613817 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier on November 3, 2020.

Keywords: Belgium; Infection prevention and control; SARS-CoV-2; School staff; School-aged children; Seroprevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to the degree of IPC measure implementation Data collected at December 2020/January 2021 in Belgian schools among pupils and staff. The black lines indicate the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals. IPC Infection prevention and control
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to the degree of subcategory IPC measures implementation. A Ventilation IPC measures, B Hygiene IPC measures, C Physical distancing measures Data collected at December 2020/January 2021 in Belgian schools among pupils and staff. The black lines indicate the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals. IPC Infection prevention and control

References

    1. Krishnaratne S, Pfadenhauer LM, Coenen M, Geffert K, Jung-Sievers C, Klinger C, et al. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic: a rapid scoping review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 5];(12). Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013812/full. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esposito S, Cotugno N, Principi N. Comprehensive and safe school strategy during COVID-19 pandemic. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-00960-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esposito S, Principi N. School Closure During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: An Effective Intervention at the Global Level? JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(10):921–922. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1892. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Litvinova M, Liu QH, Kulikov ES, Ajelli M. Reactive school closure weakens the network of social interactions and reduces the spread of influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(27):13174–13181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821298116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoon Y, Kim KR, Park H, Kim S, Kim YJ. Stepwise School Opening and an Impact on the Epidemiology of COVID-19 in the Children. J Korean Med Sci [Internet]. 2020 Nov 20 [cited 2021 Aug 6];35(46). Available from: https://synapse.koreamed.org/articles/1146252?viewtype=pubreader. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data