Baseline antipsychotic prescription and short-term outcome indicators in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Findings from the Parma At-Risk Mental States (PARMS) program
- PMID: 37194411
- DOI: 10.1111/eip.13434
Baseline antipsychotic prescription and short-term outcome indicators in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Findings from the Parma At-Risk Mental States (PARMS) program
Abstract
Aim: The prognostic prediction of outcomes in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) is still a significant clinical challenge. Among multiple baseline variables of risk calculator models, the role of ongoing pharmacological medications has been partially neglected, despite meta-analytical evidence of higher risk of psychosis transition associated with baseline prescription exposure to antipsychotics (AP) in CHR-P individuals. The main aim of the current study was to test the hypothesis that ongoing AP need at baseline indexes a subgroup of CHR-P individuals with more severe psychopathology and worse prognostic trajectories along a 1-year follow-up period.
Methods: This research was settled within the 'Parma At-Risk Mental States' program. Baseline and 1-year follow-up assessment included the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). CHR-P individuals who were taking AP medications at entry were included in the CHR-P-AP+ subgroup. The remaining participants were grouped as CHR-P-AP-.
Results: Hundred and seventy-eight CHR-P individuals (aged 12-25 years) were enrolled (91 CHR-P-AP+, 87 CHR-P-AP-). Compared to CHR-P AP-, CHR-P AP+ individuals had older age, greater baseline PANSS 'Positive Symptoms' and 'Negative Symptoms' factor subscores and a lower GAF score. At the end of our follow-up, CHR-P-AP+ subjects showed higher rates of psychosis transition, new hospitalizations and urgent/non-planned visits compared to CHRP- AP- individuals.
Conclusions: In agreement with increasing empirical evidence, also the results of the current study suggest that AP need is a significant prognostic variable in cohorts of CHR-P individuals and should be included in risk calculators.
Keywords: antipsychotics; clinical high risk for psychosis; prognostic models; risk calculators; transition to psychosis.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2016). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). APA Press.
-
- Chouinard, G., Samaha, A. N., Chouinard, V. A., Peretti, C. S., Kanahara, N., Takase, M., & Iyo, M. (2017). Antipsychotic-induced dopamine supersensitivity psychosis: Pharmacology, criteria, and therapy. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 86, 189-219. https://doi.org/10.1159/000477313
-
- First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2016). Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 disorders (SCID-5). New York State Psychiatric Institute.
-
- Gale, T. M., & Boland, B. (2019). A model for predicting missing items on the health of the nation outcome scale (HoNOS). Comprehensive Psychiatry, 93, 61-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.06.005
-
- Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987). The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/13.2.261
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
