Use of ileostomy versus colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer: retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 37194457
- PMCID: PMC10189278
- DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad038
Use of ileostomy versus colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer: retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer causes the majority of large bowel obstructions and surgical resection remains the gold standard for curative treatment. There is evidence that a deviating stoma as a bridge to surgery can reduce postoperative mortality rate; however, the optimal stoma type is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between ileostomy and colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer.
Methods: This was a national, retrospective population-based cohort study with 75 contributing hospitals. Patients with radiological left-sided obstructive colon cancer between 2009 and 2016, where a deviating stoma was used as a bridge to surgery, were included. Exclusion criteria were palliative treatment intent, perforation at presentation, emergency resection, and multivisceral resection.
Results: A total of 321 patients underwent a deviating stoma; 41 (12.7 per cent) ileostomies and 280 (87.2 per cent) colostomies. The ileostomy group had longer length of stay (median 13 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 10-16) versus 9 (i.q.r. 6-14) days, P = 0.003) and more nutritional support during the bridging interval. Both groups showed similar complication rates in the bridging interval and after primary resection, including anastomotic leakage. Stoma reversal during resection was more common in the colostomy group (9 (22.0 per cent) versus 129 (46.1 per cent) for ileostomy and colostomy respectively, P = 0.006).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that patients having a colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer had a shorter length of stay and lower need for nutritional support. No difference in postoperative complications were found.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal Aet al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–249 - PubMed
-
- Frago R, Ramirez E, Millan M, Kreisler E, del Valle E, Biondo S. Current management of acute malignant large bowel obstruction: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2014;207:127–138 - PubMed
-
- Kolfschoten NE, Wouters MWJM, Gooiker GA, Eddes EH, Kievit J, Tollenaar RAEMet al. . Nonelective colon cancer resections in elderly patients: results from the Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Dig Surg 2012;29:412–419 - PubMed
-
- Veld JV, Amelung FJ, Borstlap WAA, van Halsema EE, Consten ECJ, Dekker JWTet al. . Decompressing stoma a s bridge to elective surgery is an effective strategy for left-sided obstructive colon cancer: a national, propensity-score matched study. Ann Surg 2020;272:738–743 - PubMed
-
- Amelung FJ, Burghgraef TA, Tanis PJ, van Hooft JE, Ter Borg F, Siersema PDet al. . Critical appraisal of oncological safety of stent as bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructing colon cancer; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018;131:66–75 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources