Evolution in the management of vestibular schwannoma: a single-center 15-year experience
- PMID: 37195345
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08009-6
Evolution in the management of vestibular schwannoma: a single-center 15-year experience
Abstract
Purpose: To highlight the changes in the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) since 2004 with a focus on small- to middle-size VS.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of the decisions made in skull base tumor board between 2004 and 2021.
Results: 1819 decisions were analyzed (average age 59.25, 54% females). Overall, 850 (47%) cases were allocated to a Wait and Scan (WS) approach, 416 (23%) received radiotherapy and 553 (30%) were treated surgically (MS). All stages considered WS increased from 39% before 2010 to 50% after 2010. Similarly, Stereotactic Radio Therapy (SRT) increased from 5 to 18%. MS decreased from 46 to 25%. It was more commonly proposed to younger patients and larger tumors, p < 0.001. For Koos stages 1, 2, and 3 there was a statistically significant increase in SRT, and a decrease in MS, p < 0.001. WS also increased for stages 1 and 2. However, such a trend was not observed for stage 3. MS remained the primary treatment modality for stage 4 tumors throughout the study period, p = 0.057. The significance of advanced age as a factor favoring SRT decreased over time. The opposite is true for serviceable hearing. There was also a decrease in the percentage of the justification "young age" in the MS category.
Conclusion: The is a continuing trend towards non-surgical treatment. Small- to medium-sized VS witnessed an increase in both WS and SRT. There is only an increase in SRT for moderately large VS. Physicians are less and less considering young age as a factor favoring MS over SRT. There is a tendency towards favoring SRT when hearing is serviceable.
Keywords: Acoustic neuroma; Microsurgery; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Treatment trend; Vestibular schwannoma; Wait and scan.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Ramsden RT (1995) The bloody angle: 100 years of acoustic neuroma surgery. J R Soc Med 88: 464P-468P. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1295305/
-
- Tos M, Charabi S, Thomsen J (1999) Incidence of vestibular schwannomas. Laryngoscope 109:736–740. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199905000-00011 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Selesnick SH, Deora M, Drotman MB, Heier LA (2016) Incidental discovery of acoustic neuromas. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70319-0 - DOI
-
- Reznitsky M, Petersen MMBS, West N, Stangerup S-E, Cayé-Thomasen P (2019) Epidemiology of vestibular schwannomas—prospective 40-year data from an unselected national cohort. Clin Epidemiol 11:981–986. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S218670 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Singh K, Singh MP, Thukral CL, Rao K, Singh K, Singh A (2015) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of cerebellopontine angle schwannomas. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 67:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0736-0 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
