Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 10:6:397-418.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-094144. Epub 2023 May 17.

Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Using Circulating DNA and RNA: Advances, Challenges, and Possibilities

Affiliations
Review

Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Using Circulating DNA and RNA: Advances, Challenges, and Possibilities

Mira N Moufarrej et al. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. .

Abstract

Prenatal screening using sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA has transformed obstetric care over the past decade and significantly reduced the number of invasive diagnostic procedures like amniocentesis for genetic disorders. Nonetheless, emergency care remains the only option for complications like preeclampsia and preterm birth, two of the most prevalent obstetrical syndromes. Advances in noninvasive prenatal testing expand the scope of precision medicine in obstetric care. In this review, we discuss advances, challenges, and possibilities toward the goal of providing proactive, personalized prenatal care. The highlighted advances focus mainly on cell-free nucleic acids; however, we also review research that uses signals from metabolomics, proteomics, intact cells, and the microbiome. We discuss ethical challenges in providing care. Finally, we look to future possibilities, including redefining disease taxonomy and moving from biomarker correlation to biological causation.

Keywords: NIPT; cfDNA; cfRNA; genomics; liquid biopsy; noninvasive prenatal testing; prenatal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Noninvasive prenatal testing provides a lens into the health of the pregnant individual, fetus, and placenta. (a) Across pregnancy, liquid biopsy tests can measure macromolecules or whole cells present in blood, including cell-free DNA and RNA (cfDNA and cfRNA), white blood cells, proteins, lipids, and metabolites. (b) This approach is useful for the screening and diagnosis of numerous pregnancy-related conditions including genetic disorders, parental cancers and infections, and obstetric syndromes like preeclampsia and preterm birth, thereby helping to guide clinical practice. Figure adapted from images created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative results for each noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) test. NIPT tests that measure cell-free DNA (cfDNA) expect equal representation from all chromosomes. Individual chromosomal imbalances suggest fetal aneuploidy [e.g., trisomy 21 (T21)], whereas genome-wide imbalances involving more than one chromosome suggest maternal malignancy (e.g., cancer). The detection of pathogenic cfDNA or cell-free RNA (cfRNA) sequences suggests infection; the detection of elevated host immune genes or pathogenic RNA suggests active infection. NIPT for prenatal complications typically assess the under- or overrepresentation of specific genes of interest; in combination using predictive models like machine learning, these unusual gene levels can suggest preeclampsia or preterm birth. Figure adapted from images created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Chetty S, Garabedian MJ, Norton ME. 2013. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening. Prenat. Diagn. 33(6):542–46 - PubMed
    1. Larion S, Warsof SL, Romary L, Mlynarczyk M, Peleg D, Abuhamad AZ. 2014. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing at a large academic referral center. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 211(6):651.e1–651.e7 - PubMed
    1. Chan YM, Leung WC, Chan WP, Leung TY, Cheng YKY, Sahota DS. 2015. Women’s uptake of non-invasive DNA testing following a high-risk screening test for trisomy 21 within a publicly funded healthcare system: findings from a retrospective review. Prenat. Diagn. 35(4):342–47 - PubMed
    1. Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, Madankumar R, Saffer C, et al. 2014. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 370(9):799–808 - PubMed
    1. Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, Cox S, Mayes N, et al. 2019. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 68(18):423–29 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources