Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 28;15(4):1785-1793.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-407. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Association between length of stay and postoperative survival in patients with lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis based on National Cancer Database

Affiliations

Association between length of stay and postoperative survival in patients with lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis based on National Cancer Database

Weicheng Kong et al. J Thorac Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Postoperative complications tend to result in prolonged hospitalization. The aim of this study was to investigate whether prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS) can predict patient survival, particularly long-term survival.

Methods: All patients undergoing lung cancer surgery between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The highest quintile of LOS (more than 8 days) was defined as prolonged length of stay (PLOS). We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) between the groups with and without PLOS (Non-PLOS). Excluding confounding factors, postoperative LOS was used as a surrogate for postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analyses were performed to analyze survival.

Results: A total of 88,007 patients were identified. After matching, 18,585 patients were enrolled in the PLOS and Non-PLOS groups, respectively. Before and after matching, 30-day rehospitalization rate and 90-day mortality in the PLOS group were significantly higher than they were in the Non-PLOS group (P<0.001), indicating a potential worse short-term postoperative survival. After matching, the median survival of the PLOS group was significantly lower than that of the Non-PLOS group (53.2 vs. 63.5 months, P<0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that PLOS is independent negative predictor of overall survival [OS; hazard ratio (HR) =1.263, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.227 to 1.301, P<0.001]. In addition, age (<70 or ≥70), gender, race, income, year of diagnosis, surgery type, pathological stage, and neoadjuvant therapy also were independent prognostic factors of postoperative survival for patients with lung cancer (all P<0.001).

Conclusions: Postoperative LOS could be taken as the quantitative indicator of postoperative complications of lung cancer in NCDB. In this study, PLOS predicted worse short-term and long-term survival independent of other factors. Avoiding PLOS could be considered to benefit patient survival after lung cancer surgery.

Keywords: Lung cancer; postoperative complications; postoperative survival; prolonged length of stay (PLOS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-407/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient selection flowchart. Included patients were screened sequentially following the exclusion criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier analysis for patients before and after matching. Survival curves were compared between PLOS and Non-PLOS groups. Dashed lines indicate median survival. PSM, propensity score matching; PLOS, prolonged length of stay.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:7-33. 10.3322/caac.21708 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19:254-66. 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petersen RH, Huang L, Kehlet H. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: need for re-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021;59:291-2. 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa435 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li R, Wang K, Qu C, et al. The effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery program on lung cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2021;13:3566-86. 10.21037/jtd-21-433 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDevitt J, Kelly M, Comber H, et al. A population-based study of hospital length of stay and emergency readmission following surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:e253-9. 10.1093/ejcts/ezt389 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources