The oesophageal balloon for respiratory monitoring in ventilated patients: updated clinical review and practical aspects
- PMID: 37197768
- PMCID: PMC10189643
- DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0186-2022
The oesophageal balloon for respiratory monitoring in ventilated patients: updated clinical review and practical aspects
Abstract
There is a well-recognised importance for personalising mechanical ventilation settings to protect the lungs and the diaphragm for each individual patient. Measurement of oesophageal pressure (P oes) as an estimate of pleural pressure allows assessment of partitioned respiratory mechanics and quantification of lung stress, which helps our understanding of the patient's respiratory physiology and could guide individualisation of ventilator settings. Oesophageal manometry also allows breathing effort quantification, which could contribute to improving settings during assisted ventilation and mechanical ventilation weaning. In parallel with technological improvements, P oes monitoring is now available for daily clinical practice. This review provides a fundamental understanding of the relevant physiological concepts that can be assessed using P oes measurements, both during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation. We also present a practical approach for implementing oesophageal manometry at the bedside. While more clinical data are awaited to confirm the benefits of P oes-guided mechanical ventilation and to determine optimal targets under different conditions, we discuss potential practical approaches, including positive end-expiratory pressure setting in controlled ventilation and assessment of inspiratory effort during assisted modes.
Copyright ©The authors 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: No financial support for this work was received. I. Telias reports a salary support grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research in the form of a Post-Doctoral Fellowship Award and personal fees from Medtronic, Getinge and MbMED SA. E. Akoumianaki reports honoraria received from Medtronic for educational seminars and lectures. L. Piquilloud reports speakers fees received from Getinge, Air Liquide, Hamilton Medical, Fisher & Paykel and Medtronic; research support received from Draeger; and consultant fees received from Löwenstein and Lungpacer. A.H. Jonkman and E. Spinelli declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Comment in
-
New insights into acute and chronic respiratory failure: highlights from the Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Conference 2022.Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Apr 5;32(168):230027. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0027-2023. Print 2023 Jun 30. Eur Respir Rev. 2023. PMID: 37019460 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, et al. . An official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice guideline: mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1253–1263. doi:10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical