Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0283863.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283863. eCollection 2023.

Higher theta-beta ratio during screen-based vs. printed paper is related to lower attention in children: An EEG study

Affiliations

Higher theta-beta ratio during screen-based vs. printed paper is related to lower attention in children: An EEG study

Michal Zivan et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Reading is considered a non-intuitive, cognitively demanding ability requiring synchronization between several neural networks supporting visual, language processing and higher-order abilities. With the involvement of technology in our everyday life, reading from a screen has become widely used. Several studies point to challenges in processing written materials from the screen due to changes in attention allocation when reading from a screen compared to reading from a printed paper. The current study examined the differences in brain activation when reading from a screen compared to reading from a printed paper focusing on spectral power related to attention in fifteen 6-8-year-old children. Using an electroencephalogram, children read two different age-appropriate texts, without illustrations, presented randomly on the screen and on a printed paper. Data were analyzed using spectral analyses in brain regions related to language, visual processing, and cognitive control, focusing on theta vs. beta waveforms. Results indicated that while reading from a printed paper was accompanied by higher energy in high-frequency bands (beta, gamma), reading from the screen was manifested by a higher power in the lower frequency bands (alpha, theta). Higher theta compared to the beta ratio, representing challenges in allocating attention to a given task, was found for the screen reading compared to the printed paper reading condition. Also, a significant negative correlation was found between differences in theta/beta ratio for screen vs paper reading and accuracy level in the age-normalized Sky-Search task measuring attention and a positive correlation with performance time. These results provide neurobiological support for the greater cognitive load and reduced focused attention during screen-based compared to print-based reading and suggest a different reliance on attention resources for the two conditions in children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Electrodes position for each ROI: top row (from left to right): frontal, left-hemispheric, right-hemispheric, and central. Bottom row: posterior-occipital, Broca’s area, Wernicke’s area.
Fig 2
Fig 2. A visualization for the location of the electrodes showing significant differences between the reading conditions per frequency band.

References

    1. Dehaene S., "Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read". (Penguin, New York, NY, 2009).
    1. Cutting L., Bailey S., Swett K., & Barquero L. A., "Neurobiological basis of word recognition and reading comprehension: distinctions, overlaps, and implications for instruction and intervention" in Reading intervention: from research to practice to research. In Reading intervention: from research to practice to research., C C. McCardle P, Ed. (Brookes Publishing Co, Baltimore, 2015).
    1. Gough P. B., & Tunmer W. E., Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education 7, 6–10 (1986).
    1. Horowitz-Kraus T., & Hutton J. S., From emergent literacy to reading: how learning to read changes a child’s brain. Acta Paediatr 104, 648–656 (2015a). doi: 10.1111/apa.13018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. T. Horowitz- Kraus, & Hutton, J. (2017) More screen time correlates with decreased functional connectivity in reading-related brain regions. in Human Brain Mapping Mapping Organization (Vancuver, Canada).

Publication types