Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0285933.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285933. eCollection 2023.

Validation of automatic monitoring of feeding behaviours in sheep and goats

Affiliations

Validation of automatic monitoring of feeding behaviours in sheep and goats

Roxanne Berthel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Monitoring the feeding and ruminating behaviour of ruminants can be used to assess their health and welfare. The MSR-jaw movement recording system (JAM-R) can automatically record the jaw movements of ruminants. The associated software Viewer2 was developed to classify these recordings in adult cattle and calculate the duration and number of mastications of feeding and ruminating. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Viewer2 in classifying the behaviour of sheep and goats and assessing their feeding and ruminating. The feeding and ruminating behaviour of ten sheep and ten goats on pasture (observed live) and of five sheep and five goats in the barn (observed by video) were compared with Viewer2 behaviour classifications. To assess the technical and welfare issues of the JAM-R, its application was tested in a feeding experiment with 24 h monitoring of the feeding behaviours of 24 sheep and 24 goats. Viewer2 worked equally well on both species. The mean (95% confidence interval) performance of Viewer2 was at a good level for feeding (accuracy: 0.8-1.0; sensitivity: 0.9-1.0; specificity: 0.6-0.9; precision: 0.7-0.9) and ruminating (accuracy: 0.8-0.9; sensitivity: 0.6-0.8; specificity: 0.8-1.0; precision: 0.9-1.0) compared with human observations, with minor differences between the conditions on pasture and in the barn. The performance improved when recording frequency was increased from 10 Hz to 20 Hz. Applying the JAM-R in a feeding experiment, 71% of the recordings executed were defined as technically error-free and produced plausible values for feeding behaviours. In conclusion, according to the values of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision, the presented JAM-R system with Viewer2 is a reliable and applicable technology for automatic recording of feeding and ruminating behaviour of sheep and goats on pasture and in the barn.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. MSR-jaw-movement recording system outside the halter (top) and integrated in the halter worn by a sheep (bottom).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Screenshot of the graphical Viewer2 output.
The pressure (mbar) is plotted against the clock time (x-axis) in a black line. The colour shaded areas indicate the periods classified as behaviour with the legend on the top. Sequences at the start (or end) of a recording that are recognised as behaviour cannot be classified (“no classification”), since the start (or end) of the behaviour is missing. The sequences classified as neither of the two behaviours are shown in white. The sequences classified as “grazing” when both behaviours occur during one recording are not represented in this file.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Estimated mean (square with error bar of 95% confidence interval) parameters of agreement of Viewer2 for feeding and ruminating with observed values of goats (dots) and sheep (circles).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Distribution of feeding and ruminating (mean ± standard deviation (shaded area)) of 24 sheep and 24 goats on three different mixed rations (HH, GH and MG, Table 1) over 24 h, with feed delivery (blue triangles) at 09:00, 11:00 and 15:00.

References

    1. Collier RJ, Beede DK, Thatcher WW, Israel LA, Wilcox CJ. Influences of environment and its modification on dairy animal health and production. Journal of Dairy Science. 1982;65(11):2213–27. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82484-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tafaj M, Maulbetsch A, Zebeli Q, Steingaß H, Drochner W. Effects of physically effective fibre concentration of diets consisting of hay and slowly degradable concentrate on chewing activity in mid lactation dairy cows under constant intake level. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 2005;59(5):313–24. doi: 10.1080/17450390500247840 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jalali AR, Nørgaard P, Weisbjerg MR, Nielsen MO. Effect of forage quality on intake, chewing activity, faecal particle size distribution, and digestibility of neutral detergent fibre in sheep, goats, and llamas. Small Ruminant Research. 2012;103(2):143–51.
    1. Soriani N, Trevisi E, Calamari L. Relationships between rumination time, metabolic conditions, and health status in dairy cows during the transition period. Journal of Animal Science. 2012;90(12):4544–54. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5064 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Humer E, Petri RM, Aschenbach JR, Bradford BJ, Penner GB, Tafaj M, et al.. Invited review: Practical feeding management recommendations to mitigate the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101(2):872–88. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13191 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources