Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 28;4(2):e288.
doi: 10.1097/PG9.0000000000000288. eCollection 2023 May.

Enteral Feeding for Moderately Premature and Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Dorita M Z Dekker  1 , Monique van Brakel  1 , Chris H P van den Akker  2   3 , Frans B Plötz  1   3   4
Affiliations

Enteral Feeding for Moderately Premature and Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Dorita M Z Dekker et al. JPGN Rep. .

Abstract

Controversy exists in clinical practice regarding optimal initial enteral feeding (EF) for moderately premature and low birth weight (BW) infants. We included 96 infants stratified into 3 groups (I: 1600-1799 g [n = 22]; II: 1800-1999 g [n = 42]; III: 2000-2200 g [n = 32]). The protocol recommended starting with minimal EF (MEF) in infants weighing <1800 g. On the first day of life, 5% of the infants in group I did not follow the protocol mandating MEF, but started with exclusive EF instead, compared to 36% and 44% of the infants in groups II and III, respectively. The median number of days until exclusive EF was achieved was 5 days longer for infants receiving MEF than for infants who had received normal portions of EF from birth onward. We observed no significant differences in feeding-related complications. We advocate omitting MEF in moderately premature infants with a BW of 1600 g or higher.

Keywords: CPAP; feeding complications; newborns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor: F.B.P. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Lapillonne A, Bronsky J, Campoy C, et al. . Feeding the late and moderately preterm infant: a position paper of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutriton. 2019;69:259–70. - PubMed
    1. Baillat M, Pauly V, Dagau G, et al. . Association of first-week nutrient intake and extrauterine growth restriction in moderately preterm infants: a regional population-based study. Nutrients. 2021;13:227. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerritsen L, Lindeboom R, Hummel T. Prescribed protein intake does not meet recommended intake in moderate- and late-preterm infants: contribution to weight gain and head growth. Nutr Clin Pract. 2020;35:729–37. - PubMed
    1. Salas AA, Kabani N, Travers CP, et al. . Short versus extended duration of trophic feeding to reduce time to achieve full enteral feeding in extremely preterm infants: an observational study. Neonatology. 2017;112:211–6. - PubMed
    1. Dutta S, Singh B, Chessell L, et al. . Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants. Nutrients. 2015;7:423–42. - PMC - PubMed