Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;40(3):734-772.
doi: 10.1177/02654075221105025. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

Relationship Maintenance among Military Couples

Affiliations

Relationship Maintenance among Military Couples

Leanne K Knobloch et al. J Soc Pers Relat. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

A burgeoning body of research on the relationship maintenance of military couples over the past two decades suggests the time is right to organize, assimilate, and critique the literature. We conducted a systematic review informed by the integrative model of relationship maintenance (Ogolsky et al., 2017) that considered issues of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991). Our literature search identified 81 relevant journal articles representing 62 unique samples. With respect to theory, 59.3% of the journal articles employed one or more formal theoretical frameworks. In terms of research design, 88.7% of the studies focused on the U.S. military, 83.9% of the studies recruited convenience samples, 54.8% of the studies utilized quantitative methods, and 30.6% of the studies collected longitudinal data. Among the studies reporting sample demographics, 96.8% of participants were married, 77.2% of participants identified as non-Hispanic White, and only one same-sex relationship was represented. Our narrative synthesis integrated findings about relationship maintenance from studies examining (a) relationship maintenance overtly, (b) communicating to stay connected across the deployment cycle, (c) disclosure and protective buffering, (d) support from a partner, (e) dyadic coping, and (f) caregiving and accommodating a partner's symptoms. We interpret our results with an eye toward advancing theory, research, and practice.

Keywords: deployment; integrative model of relationship maintenance; military; military couples; relationship maintenance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ogolsky et al.’s (2017) Integrative Model of Relationship Maintenance Note. From “Relationship Maintenance: A Review of Research on Romantic Relationships” by B. C. Ogolsky, J. K. Monk, T. M. Rice, J. C. Theisen, and C. R. Maniotes, 2017, Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(3), p. 277 (https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205). Copyright 2017 by John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA Diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abraham T, Cheney AM, & Curran GM (2017). A Bourdieusian analysis of U.S. military culture ground in the mental help-seeking literature. American Journal of Men’s Health, 11(5), 1358–1365. 10.1177/1557988315596037 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afifi TD, Basinger ED, & Kam JA (2020). The extended theoretical model of communal coping: Understanding the properties and functionality of communal coping. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 424–446. 10.1093/joc/jqaa006 - DOI
    1. Alford B, & Lee SJ (2016). Toward complete inclusion: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender military service members after repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Social Work, 61(3), 257–265. 10.1093/sw/sww033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen E, Renshaw K, Fredman SJ, Le Y, Rhoades G, Markman H, & Litz B (2021). Associations between service members’ posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and partner accommodation over time. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(3), 596–606. 10.1002/jts.22645 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen ES, Post KM, Markman HJ, Rhoades GK, & Stanley SM (2017). Associations between participant ratings of PREP for Strong Bonds and marital outcomes 1 year postintervention. Military Psychology, 29(4), 283–293. 10.1037/mil0000155 - DOI - PMC - PubMed