Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 18;13(5):e063026.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063026.

Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review

Affiliations

Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review

M Denika C Silva et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review and provide estimates of the minimal important change (MIC) and difference (MID) for outcome tools in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after non-surgical interventions. Design A systematic review.

Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to 21 September 2021.

Eligibility criteria: We included studies that calculated MIC and MID using any calculation method including anchor, consensus and distribution methods, for any knee OA outcome tool after non-surgical interventions.

Data extraction and synthesis: We extracted reported MIC, MID and minimum detectable change (MDC) estimates. We used quality assessment tools appropriate to the studies' methods to screen out low-quality studies. Values were combined to produce a median and range, for each method.

Results: Forty-eight studies were eligible (anchor-k=12, consensus-k=1 and distribution-k=35). MIC values for 13 outcome tools including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QOL) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)-function were estimated using 5 high-quality anchor studies. MID values for 23 tools including KOOS-pain, ADL, QOL and WOMAC-function, stiffness and total were estimated using 6 high-quality anchor studies. One moderate quality consensus study reported MIC for pain, function and global assessment. MDC values from distribution method estimates for 126 tools including KOOS-QOL and WOMAC-total were estimated using 38 good-to-fair-quality studies.

Conclusion: Median MIC, MID and MDC estimates were reported for outcome tools in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions. The results of this review clarify the current understanding of MIC, MID and MDC in the knee OA population. However, some estimates suggest considerable heterogeneity and require careful interpretation.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020215952.

Keywords: Knee; Musculoskeletal disorders; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection (PRISMA). PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

References

    1. Harris JD, Brand JC, Cote MP, et al. . Research pearls: the significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 1: clinical versus statistical significance. Arthroscopy 2017;33:1102–12. 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.053 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, et al. . Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010;63:524–34. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, et al. . Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:54. 10.1186/1477-7525-4-54 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010;63:804–5. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Vet HCW, Beckerman H, Terwee CB, et al. . Definition of clinical differences. J Rheumatol 2006;33:434; author reply 435. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources