Three-Dimensional Spheroids for Cancer Research
- PMID: 37202612
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3056-3_3
Three-Dimensional Spheroids for Cancer Research
Abstract
In vitro cell culture is one of the most widely used tools used today for increasing our understanding of various things such as protein production, mechanisms of drug action, tissue engineering, and overall cellular biology. For the past decades, however, cancer researchers have relied heavily on conventional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer culture techniques to test a variety of aspects of cancer research ranging from the cytotoxic effects of antitumor drugs to the toxicity of diagnostic dyes and contact tracers. However, many promising cancer therapies have either weak or no efficacy in real-life conditions, therefore delaying or stopping altogether their translating to the clinic. This is, in part, due to the reductionist 2D cultures used to test these materials, which lack appropriate cell-cell contacts, have altered signaling, do not represent the natural tumor microenvironment, and have different drug responses, due to their reduced malignant phenotype when compared to real in vivo tumors. With the most recent advances, cancer research has moved into 3D biological investigation. Three-dimensional (3D) cultures of cancer cells not only recapitulate the in vivo environment better than their 2D counterparts, but they have, in recent years, emerged as a relatively low-cost and scientifically accurate methodology for studying cancer. In this chapter, we highlight the importance of 3D culture, specifically 3D spheroid culture, reviewing some key methodologies for forming 3D spheroids, discussing the experimental tools that can be used in conjunction with 3D spheroids and finally their applications in cancer research.
Keywords: 3D models; Cancer research; Spheroid.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Kapalczynska M, Kolenda T, Przybyla W, Zajaczkowska M, Teresiak A, Filas V et al (2018) 2D and 3D cell cultures – a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Arch Med Sci 14(4):910–919. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.63743 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Duval K, Grover H, Han L-H, Mou Y, Pegoraro AF, Fredberg J et al (2017) Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology (Bethesda) 32(4):266–277. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00036.2016 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Quail DF, Joyce JA (2013) Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med 19(11):1423–1437. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3394 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Belli C, Trapani D, Viale G, D’Amico P, Duso BA, Della Vigna P et al (2018) Targeting the microenvironment in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev 65:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pinto B, Henriques AC, Silva PMA, Bousbaa H (2020) Three-dimensional spheroids as in vitro preclinical models for cancer research. Pharmaceutics 12(12):1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12121186 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous