Reconsidering the route of drug delivery in refractory multiple sclerosis: Toward a more effective drug accumulation in the central nervous system
- PMID: 37203228
- DOI: 10.1002/med.21973
Reconsidering the route of drug delivery in refractory multiple sclerosis: Toward a more effective drug accumulation in the central nervous system
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating disease with different disease phenotypes. The current FDA-approved disease-modifying therapeutics (DMTs) cannot cure the disease, but only alleviate the disease progression. While the majority of patients respond well to treatment, some of them are suffering from rapid progression. Current drug delivery strategies include the oral, intravenous, subdermal, and intramuscular routes, so these drugs are delivered systemically, which is appropriate when the therapeutic targets are peripheral. However, the potential benefits may be diminished when these targets sequester behind the barriers of the central nervous system. Moreover, systemic drug administration is plagued with adverse effects, sometimes severe. In this context, it is prudent to consider other drug delivery strategies improving their accumulation in the brain, thus providing better prospects for patients with rapidly progressing disease course. These targeted drug delivery strategies may also reduce the severity of systemic adverse effects. Here, we discuss the possibilities and indications for reconsideration of drug delivery routes (especially for those "non-responding" patients) and the search for alternative drug delivery strategies. More targeted drug delivery strategies sometimes require quite invasive procedures, but the potential therapeutic benefits and reduction of adverse effects could outweigh the risks. We characterized the major FDA-approved DMTs focusing on their therapeutic mechanism and the potential benefits of improving the accumulation of these drugs in the brain.
Keywords: blood-brain barrier; drug delivery; multiple sclerosis; precision medicine; stem cell therapy.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Nichols E, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurology. 2019;18(3):269-285. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30443-5
-
- Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2014;83(3):278-286. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000560
-
- Lublin FD, Coetzee T, Cohen JA, Marrie RA, Thompson AJ. The 2013 clinical course descriptors for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2020;94(24):1088-1092. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009636
-
- Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. The Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1502-1517. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7
-
- Río J, Nos C, Tintoré M, et al. Defining the response to interferon-β in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(2):344-352. doi:10.1002/ana.20740
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources