Efficacy of innovative therapies in myasthenia gravis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis
- PMID: 37204031
- DOI: 10.1111/ene.15872
Efficacy of innovative therapies in myasthenia gravis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background and purpose: Therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG) is undergoing a profound change, with new treatments being tested. These include complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockers. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized and placebo-controlled trials of innovative therapies in MG with available efficacy data.
Methods: We assessed statistical heterogeneity across trials based on the Cochrane Q test and I2 values, and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Treatment efficacy was assessed after 26 weeks of eculizumab and ravulizumab, 28 days of efgartigimod, 43 days of rozanolixizumab, 12 weeks of zilucoplan, and 16, 24 or 52 weeks of rituximab treatment.
Results: We observed an overall mean Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) score change of -2.17 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.67, -1.67; p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. No significant difference emerged between complement inhibitors and anti-FcRn treatment (p = 0.16). The change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale (QMG) score was -3.46 (95% CI -4.53, -2.39; p < 0.001), with a higher reduction with FcRns (-4.78 vs. -2.60; p < 0.001). Rituximab did not significantly improve the MG-ADL (-0.92 [95% CI -2.24, 0.39]; p = 0.17) or QMG scores (-1.9 [95% CI -3.97, 0.18]; p = 0.07). In the network meta-analysis, efgartigimod had the highest probability of being the best treatment, followed by rozanolixizumab.
Conclusion: Anti-complement and FcRn treatments both proved to be effective in MG patients, whereas rituximab did not show a significant benefit for patients. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, including efficacy time points, FcRn treatments showed a greater effect on QMG score in the short term. Real-life studies with long-term measurements are needed to confirm our results.
Keywords: FcRn inhibitor; comparative; complement inhibitor; innovative treatment; trial.
© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.
Comment in
-
A clinical concern: Neisseria meningitidis as a reemerging pathogen with increased antimicrobial resistance.Eur J Neurol. 2023 Dec;30(12):3986-3987. doi: 10.1111/ene.16019. Epub 2023 Aug 9. Eur J Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37531249 No abstract available.
-
Advancements in targeted therapies for generalized acetylcholine receptor antibody positive myasthenia gravis: Beginnings of a paradigm shift.Eur J Neurol. 2023 Dec;30(12):3644-3645. doi: 10.1111/ene.16037. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Eur J Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37578121 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gilhus NE. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2570-2581.
-
- Verschuuren JJ, Huijbers MG, Plomp JJ, et al. Pathophysiology of myasthenia gravis with antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, muscle-specific kinase and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12:918-923.
-
- Engel AG, Arahata K. The membrane attack complex of complement at the endplate in myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;505:326-332.
-
- Drachman DB, Adams RN, Josifek LF, Self SG. Functional activities of autoantibodies to acetylcholine receptors and the clinical severity of myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:769-775.
-
- Cole RN, Ghazanfari N, Ngo ST, Gervasio OL, Reddel SW, Phillips WD. Patient autoantibodies deplete postsynaptic muscle-specific kinase leading to disassembly of the ACh receptor scaffold and myasthenia gravis in mice. J Physiol. 2010;588:3217-3229.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
