Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;44(10):3395-3427.
doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06821-w. Epub 2023 May 19.

An updated overview of recent and ongoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) trials in patients with dementia: a systematic review

Affiliations

An updated overview of recent and ongoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) trials in patients with dementia: a systematic review

Giulia Remoli et al. Neurol Sci. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Dementia affects more than 55 million people worldwide. Several technologies have been developed to slow cognitive decline: deep brain stimulation (DBS) of network targets in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) have been recently investigated.

Objective: This study aimed to review the characteristics of the populations, protocols, and outcomes of patients with dementia enrolled in clinical trials investigating the feasibility and efficacy of DBS.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of all registered RCTs was performed on Clinicaltrials.gov and EudraCT, while a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and APA PsycInfo to identify published trials.

Results: The literature search yielded 2122 records, and the clinical trial search 15 records. Overall, 17 studies were included. Two of 17 studies were open-label studies reporting no NCT/EUCT code and were analysed separately. Of 12 studies investigating the role of DBS in AD, we included 5 published RCTs, 2 unregistered open-label (OL) studies, 3 recruiting studies, and 2 unpublished trials with no evidence of completion. The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate-high. Our review showed significant heterogeneity in the recruited populations regarding age, disease severity, informed consent availability, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. Notably, the standard mean of overall severe adverse events was moderately high (SAEs: 9.10 ± 7.10%).

Conclusion: The population investigated is small and heterogeneous, published results from clinical trials are under-represented, severe adverse events not negligible, and cognitive outcomes uncertain. Overall, the validity of these studies requires confirmation based on forthcoming higher-quality clinical trials.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Cognitive decline; DBS; Deep brain stimulation; Dementia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ballard C, Gauthier S, Corbett A et al (2011) Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 377:1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61349-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kurkinen M, Tran L (2021) Aduhelm: the best hope for Alzheimer’s disease patients or the worst decision the FDA has ever made? J Alzheimers Dis 84:969–971. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215105 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy SM (2023) Lecanemab: first approval. Drugs 83:359–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-023-01851-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugiyama K, Nozaki T, Asakawa T et al (2015) The present indication and future of deep brain stimulation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 55:416–421. https://doi.org/10.2176/NMC.RA.2014-0394 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kahn L, Sutton B, Winston HR et al (2021) Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: real world experience post-FDA-humanitarian use device approval. Front Psych 12:238. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2021.568932/BIBTEX - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources