Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;59(3):303-316.
doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07754-7. Epub 2023 May 19.

When the practice does not meet the theory: results from an Italian survey on the clinical and pathway management of inpatients with decompressive craniectomy or cranioplasty admitted to rehabilitation

Collaborators, Affiliations

When the practice does not meet the theory: results from an Italian survey on the clinical and pathway management of inpatients with decompressive craniectomy or cranioplasty admitted to rehabilitation

Fabio LA Porta et al. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Cranioplasty (CP) is supposed to improve the functional outcome of severe acquired brain injury (sABI) patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC). However, ongoing controversies exist regarding its indications, optimum materials, timing, complications, and relationships with hydrocephalus (HC). For these reasons, an International Consensus Conference (ICC) on CP in traumatic brain injury (TBI) was held in June 2018 to issue some recommendations.

Aim: The aims of this study were: to investigate cross-sectionally before the ICC the prevalence of DC/CP in sABI inpatients admitted to neurorehabilitation units in Italy; to assess the perception of Italian clinicians working in the sABI neurorehabilitation settings on the management of inpatients with DC/CP during their rehabilitation stay.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting and population: Physiatrists or neurologists working in 38 Italian rehabilitation centers involved in the care of sABI, giving a pooled sample of 599 inpatients.

Methods: Survey questionnaire consisting of 21 closed-ended questions with multiple-choice answers. Sixteen questions regarded the respondents' opinions and experiences regarding the clinical and management aspects of patients. Survey data were collected via e-mail between April and May 2018.

Results: About 1/3 of the 599 inpatients had either a DC (18.9%) or a CP (13.5%). TBI and cerebral hemorrhage were strongly associated with DC/CP, although the association was much stronger for TBI. Significant discrepancies were uncovered between some of the recommendations of the ICC and the corresponding perceptions of the respondents, especially regarding the clinical management of patients (i.e., CP timing). Clear guidelines were perceived as the most crucial factor in improving clinical pathways.

Conclusions: Early collaboration between the neurosurgical and the neurorehabilitation teams is crucial to optimize all clinical and organizational factors, which could expedite CP and minimize the risk of complications, such as infections and HC, to ensure the best possible outcome for DC patients, regardless of the etiology of the sABI.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: There may be different attitudes and perceptions, if not controversies, between neurorehabilitation physicians and neurosurgeons regarding the optimal clinical and care pathway management of patients with DC/CP in Italy. Therefore, an Italian Consensus Conference involving all stakeholders on the clinical and management pathways of DC/CP patients admitted to neurorehabilitation is advocated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

References

    1. De Tanti A, Zampolini M, Pregno S, Group CC; CC3 Group. Recommendations for clinical practice and research in severe brain injury in intensive rehabilitation: the Italian Consensus Conference. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015;51:89–103. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... - PubMed
    1. Rossini Z, Nicolosi F, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ, De Sanctis P, Servadei F. The History of Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Neurol 2019;10:458. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.3389/fneur.2019.00458 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Formisano R, Contrada M, Colli G, Lombardi F. Decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty: the point of view of the neurorehabilitation team. J Neurosurg Sci 2020;64:494–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04789-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tagliaferri F, Zani G, Iaccarino C, Ferro S, Ridolfi L, Basaglia N, et al. Decompressive craniectomies, facts and fiction: a retrospective analysis of 526 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:919–26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1007/s00701-012-1318-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim DB, Park SK, Moon BH, Cho BR, Jang DK, Jang KS. Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in large supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 2018;50:208–13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.066 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms