Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2023 May 23:2023.04.30.23289317.
doi: 10.1101/2023.04.30.23289317.

Geographic pair-matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials

Affiliations

Geographic pair-matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials

Benjamin F Arnold et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

  • Geographic pair matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials.
    Arnold BF, Rerolle F, Tedijanto C, Njenga SM, Rahman M, Ercumen A, Mertens A, Pickering AJ, Lin A, Arnold CD, Das K, Stewart CP, Null C, Luby SP, Colford JM Jr, Hubbard AE, Benjamin-Chung J. Arnold BF, et al. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 5;15(1):1069. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45152-y. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38316755 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Custer randomized trials are often used to study large-scale public health interventions. In large trials, even small improvements in statistical efficiency can have profound impacts on the required sample size and cost. Pair matched randomization is one strategy with potential to increase trial efficiency, but to our knowledge there have been no empirical evaluations of pair-matching in large-scale, epidemiologic field trials. Location integrates many socio-demographic and environmental characteristics into a single feature. Here, we show that geographic pair-matching leads to substantial gains in statistical efficiency for 14 child health outcomes that span growth, development, and infectious disease through a re-analysis of two large-scale trials of nutritional and environmental interventions in Bangladesh and Kenya. We estimate relative efficiencies ≥1.1 for all outcomes assessed and relative efficiencies regularly exceed 2.0, meaning an unmatched trial would have needed to enroll at least twice as many clusters to achieve the same level of precision as the geographically pair-matched design. We also show that geographically pair-matched designs enable estimation of fine-scale, spatially varying effect heterogeneity under minimal assumptions. Our results demonstrate broad, substantial benefits of geographic pair-matching in large-scale, cluster randomized trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Murray D. M., Varnell S. P. & Blitstein J. L. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health 94, 423–432 (2004). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dron L. et al. The role and challenges of cluster randomised trials for global health. Lancet Glob. Health 9, e701–e710 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Hayes R. J. & Moulton L. H. Cluster randomised trials. (Taylor & Francis Group, 2017).
    1. Luby S. P. et al. Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 6, e302–e315 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Null C. et al. Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 6, e316–e329 (2018). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types