Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2023 May 4:rs.3.rs-2869532.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2869532/v1.

Evaluating Caregiver-Clinician Communication for Tracheostomy Placement in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Inquiry

Kylie Bushroe  1 , Kelly Crisp  2 , Mary Politi  3 , Steven Brennan  4 , Ashley Housten  3
Affiliations

Evaluating Caregiver-Clinician Communication for Tracheostomy Placement in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Inquiry

Kylie Bushroe et al. Res Sq. .

Update in

Abstract

Objective: Identify stakeholders' tracheostomy decision-making information priorities in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).

Study design: English-speaking caregivers and clinicians who participated in NICU tracheostomy discussions between January 2017 and December 2021 were eligible. They reviewed a pediatric tracheostomy communication guide prior to meeting. Interviews focused on tracheostomy decision-making experiences, communication preferences, and guide perceptions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using iterative inductive/deductive coding to inform thematic analysis.

Results: Ten caregivers and nine clinicians were interviewed. Caregivers were surprised by the severity of their child's diagnosis and the intensive home care required, but proceeded with tracheostomy because it was the only chance for survival. All recommended that tracheostomy information be introduced early and in phases. Inadequate communication limited caregivers' understanding of post-surgical care and discharge requirements. All felt a guide could standardize communication.

Conclusions: Caregivers seek detailed information regarding expectations after tracheostomy placement in the NICU and at home.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The author MP was a consultant for UCB Biopharma in 2022 on a topic unrelated to this manuscript.

References

    1. Wang CS, Kou YF, Shah GB, Mitchell RB, Johnson RF. Tracheostomy in Extremely Preterm Neonates in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(8):2056–2062. doi: 10.1002/lary.28304 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Smith PB, Quek MBH, Laughon MM, Clark RH, Hornik CP. Risk factors and in-hospital outcomes following tracheostomy in infants. Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;173:39–44.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.01.072 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang J, Sidell DR. Tracheostomy in Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Education/Practice Gaps. http://neoreviews.aappublications.org/ - PubMed
    1. Mahida JB, Asti L, Boss EF, et al. Tracheostomy placement in children younger than 2 years 30-day outcomes using the national surgical quality improvement program pediatric. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(3):241–246. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3302 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amar-Dolan LG, Horn MH, O’Connell B, et al. This is how hard it is” family experience of hospital-to-home transition with a tracheostomy. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17(7):860–868. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201910-780OC - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources