Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;75(Suppl 1):210-215.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03317-5. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

Considerations on Ossicular Reconstruction Using Lenticular Prosthesis for the Necrosed Lenticular Process During Endoscopic Tympanoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media (Mucosal) Cases

Affiliations

Considerations on Ossicular Reconstruction Using Lenticular Prosthesis for the Necrosed Lenticular Process During Endoscopic Tympanoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media (Mucosal) Cases

Arvind Varma et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate hearing outcome and fate of LPIRP (lenticular process of incus replacement prosthesis) prosthesis in the reconstruction of erosion of long process of the incus. Methods: In this retrospective descriptive study 17 patients with erosion of long process of incus who were operated (reconstructed with LPIRP prosthesis) between January 2015 to December 2017 in a tertiary care center were included. The hearing outcome was evaluated by comparing mean PTA and mean ABG preoperatively and postoperatively at the end of 3 months and 18 months. The graft uptake rate, reperforation, and extrusion of the prosthesis were assessed using otoendoscopy. Results: Preoperative mean PTA was 53.8 dB while mean postoperative PTA was 36.6 dB and 33.4 dB at the end of 3 and 18 months respectively (p-value ˂ 0.05). The mean preoperative ABG was 30.2 dB while the postoperative mean was 13.4 dB and 11.2 dB at the end of 3 months and 18 months respectively (p < 0.05). Extrusion with re-perforation was seen only in one case 1/17 (5.8%). Conclusion: LPIRP has all the characteristics for an ideal middle ear implant which is a cost-effective alternative in the reconstruction of an eroded long process of the incus.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03317-5.

Keywords: Erosion of long process of incus; Hearing outcome; Lenticular process of incus replacement prosthesis (LPIRP).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest/Competing InterestsAll authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The design of LPIRP prosthesis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Defect of Incus long process where LPIRP was used
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Defect closed by LPIRP prosthesis

References

    1. Austin DF. Ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1972;5:145–160. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6665(20)33024-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tos M Type 2 tympanoplasty, stapes present. In: Tos M, ed. Manual of Middle ears Surgery.Stuttgart:Thieme;1993:245–284
    1. Dost P, Jahnke K. Biomaterials in reconstructive middle ear surgery. In: Jahnke K, editor. Middle ear surgery recent advances and future directions. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2004. pp. 53–70.
    1. Wehers RE (1991) Hearing results with incus and incus stapes prostheses of hydroxylapatite laryngoscope. 101:555–556 - PubMed
    1. Chien W, Northrop C, Levine S, Pilch Ben Z, Peake WT, Rosowski John J, Merchant N. Anatomy of the distal incus in humans. J Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2009;10:485–496. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0179-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources