Considerations on Ossicular Reconstruction Using Lenticular Prosthesis for the Necrosed Lenticular Process During Endoscopic Tympanoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media (Mucosal) Cases
- PMID: 37206711
- PMCID: PMC10188699
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-022-03317-5
Considerations on Ossicular Reconstruction Using Lenticular Prosthesis for the Necrosed Lenticular Process During Endoscopic Tympanoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media (Mucosal) Cases
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate hearing outcome and fate of LPIRP (lenticular process of incus replacement prosthesis) prosthesis in the reconstruction of erosion of long process of the incus. Methods: In this retrospective descriptive study 17 patients with erosion of long process of incus who were operated (reconstructed with LPIRP prosthesis) between January 2015 to December 2017 in a tertiary care center were included. The hearing outcome was evaluated by comparing mean PTA and mean ABG preoperatively and postoperatively at the end of 3 months and 18 months. The graft uptake rate, reperforation, and extrusion of the prosthesis were assessed using otoendoscopy. Results: Preoperative mean PTA was 53.8 dB while mean postoperative PTA was 36.6 dB and 33.4 dB at the end of 3 and 18 months respectively (p-value ˂ 0.05). The mean preoperative ABG was 30.2 dB while the postoperative mean was 13.4 dB and 11.2 dB at the end of 3 months and 18 months respectively (p < 0.05). Extrusion with re-perforation was seen only in one case 1/17 (5.8%). Conclusion: LPIRP has all the characteristics for an ideal middle ear implant which is a cost-effective alternative in the reconstruction of an eroded long process of the incus.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03317-5.
Keywords: Erosion of long process of incus; Hearing outcome; Lenticular process of incus replacement prosthesis (LPIRP).
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest/Competing InterestsAll authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Tos M Type 2 tympanoplasty, stapes present. In: Tos M, ed. Manual of Middle ears Surgery.Stuttgart:Thieme;1993:245–284
-
- Dost P, Jahnke K. Biomaterials in reconstructive middle ear surgery. In: Jahnke K, editor. Middle ear surgery recent advances and future directions. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2004. pp. 53–70.
-
- Wehers RE (1991) Hearing results with incus and incus stapes prostheses of hydroxylapatite laryngoscope. 101:555–556 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous