Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 17;10(5):221255.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.221255. eCollection 2023 May.

Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Madeleine Pownall  1 Flávio Azevedo  2 Laura M König  3 Hannah R Slack  4 Thomas Rhys Evans  5   6 Zoe Flack  7 Sandra Grinschgl  8 Mahmoud M Elsherif  9 Katie A Gilligan-Lee  10 Catia M F de Oliveira  11 Biljana Gjoneska  12 Tamara Kalandadze  13 Katherine Button  14 Sarah Ashcroft-Jones  15 Jenny Terry  16 Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir  17   18 Filip Děchtěrenko  19 Shilaan Alzahawi  20 Bradley J Baker  21 Merle-Marie Pittelkow  22 Lydia Riedl  23 Kathleen Schmidt  24 Charlotte R Pennington  25 John J Shaw  26 Timo Lüke  27 Matthew C Makel  28 Helena Hartmann  29 Mirela Zaneva  15 Daniel Walker  30 Steven Verheyen  31 Daniel Cox  32 Jennifer Mattschey  17 Tom Gallagher-Mitchell  33 Peter Branney  30 Yanna Weisberg  34 Kamil Izydorczak  35 Ali H Al-Hoorie  36 Ann-Marie Creaven  37 Suzanne L K Stewart  38 Kai Krautter  39 Karen Matvienko-Sikar  40 Samuel J Westwood  41 Patrícia Arriaga  42 Meng Liu  43 Myriam A Baum  39 Tobias Wingen  44 Robert M Ross  45 Aoife O'Mahony  46 Agata Bochynska  47 Michelle Jamieson  48 Myrthe Vel Tromp  49 Siu Kit Yeung  50 Martin R Vasilev  51 Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe  52   53 Leticia Micheli  54 Markus Konkol  55 David Moreau  56 James E Bartlett  57 Kait Clark  58 Gwen Brekelmans  59 Theofilos Gkinopoulos  60 Samantha L Tyler  61 Jan Philipp Röer  62 Zlatomira G Ilchovska  9 Christopher R Madan  4 Olly Robertson  63   64 Bethan J Iley  65 Samuel Guay  66 Martina Sladekova  16   7 Shanu Sadhwani  7 FORRT
Affiliations
Review

Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Madeleine Pownall et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students' understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

Keywords: higher education; open research; open scholarship; open science; pedagogy; teaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

References

    1. Azevedo F, Liu M, Pennington CR, Pownall M, Evans TR, Parsons S, Elsherif M, Micheli L, Westwood SJ and FORRT. 2022. Towards a culture of open scholarship: the role of pedagogical communities. BMC Res. Notes 15, 75. (10.1186/s13104-022-05944-1) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azevedo F, Middleton S, Phan JM, Kapp S, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe A, Iley B, Elsherif M, Shaw JJ. 2022. Navigating academia as neurodivergent researchers: promoting neurodiversity within Open Scholarship. APS Observer 35. See https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/gs-navigating-academia-as-....
    1. Azevedo F, et al. 2019. Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). PsyArXiv. (10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p) - DOI
    1. Parsons S, et al. 2022. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 312-318. (10.1038/s41562-02101269-4) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manalili MA, et al. 2023. From puzzle to progress: how engaging with neurodiversity can improve cognitive science. Cogn. Sci. 47, e13255. (10.1111/cogs.13255) - DOI - PMC - PubMed