"In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse": A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany
- PMID: 37207395
- PMCID: PMC10159659
- DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854
"In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse": A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany
Abstract
Objective: The World Health Organization recognizes abortion as essential health care and has encouraged governments to ensure access to abortion services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the threat of infection combined with government responses to COVID-19 have impacted access to abortion services globally. This study explores access to abortion in Germany during the pandemic.
Methods: This study used a mixed-methods design. An analysis of data collected by Women on Web (WoW) was carried out to assess women's reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion outside the formal health system in Germany during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were generated for 2057 requests for telemedicine abortion received by WoW between March 2020-March 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals involved in the provision of abortion services to explore how they perceive of women's access to abortion services in Germany during the pandemic.
Results: The quantitative analysis found that preferences and needs for privacy (47.3%), secrecy (44.4%) and comfort (43.9%) were the most common reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion. COVID-19 was another important reason (38.8%). The thematic analysis of the interviews was organized into two overarching themes: service provision, and axes of difference.
Conclusions: The pandemic affected the provision of abortion services as well as the circumstances of women seeking abortion. The main barriers to access were financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers. Throughout the pandemic, accessing abortion services was more difficult for many women in Germany, especially women experiencing multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination.
Keywords: Abortion; Abortion access; Barriers to access; Germany; Health policies; Telemedicine abortion.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Coauthors HR and BT declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Coauthors RG and HA work for or are affiliated with WoW.
References
-
- Todd-Gher J, Shah PK. Abortion in the context of COVID-19: A human rights imperative. Sex Reprod Heal Matters [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2021 Apr 7];28(1):28–30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32308156/. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nandagiri R, Coast E, Strong J. COVID-19 and abortion: Making structural violence visible. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46(Supplement 1, Focus on Abortion):83–9. - PubMed
-
- Fok W.K., Mark A. Abortion through telemedicine. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(6):394–399. - PubMed
-
- Killinger K., Günther S., Gomperts R., Atay H., Endler M. Why women choose abortion through telemedicine outside the formal health sector in Germany: A mixed-methods study. BMJ Sex Reprod Heal. 2020:1–7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
