Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 19;18(1):184.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02228-y.

Review on risk factors, classification, and treatment of sternal wound infection

Affiliations
Review

Review on risk factors, classification, and treatment of sternal wound infection

Yaoyao Song et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Sternal wound infection (SWI) is the most common complication of the median sternal incision. The treatment time is long, and the reconstruction is difficult, which causes challenges for surgeons. Plastic surgeons were often involved too late in such clinical scenarios when previous empirical treatments failed and the wound damage was relatively serious. Accurate diagnosis and risk factors against sternal wound infection need to be in focus. Classification of different types of sternotomy complications post-cardiac surgery is important for specific categorization and management. Not familiar with this kind of special and complex wound, objectively increasing the difficulty of wound reconstruction. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to review the literature, introduce various SWI risk factors related to wound nonunion, various classification characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of various wound reconstruction strategies, to help clinicians understand the pathophysiological characteristics of the disease and choose a better treatment method.

Keywords: Classification; Risk factors; Sternal wound infection; Wound reconstruction strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anatomical flap location for sternal coverage (A, omentum B, pectoralis major C, rectus abdominis D, latissimus dorsi E, superior epigastric artery perforator F, heart G sternal defect)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SWI acute treatment algorithm

References

    1. Yang JF, Yang K, Xia HN, et al. Clinical characteristics of deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery and etiological analysis. Chin J Nosocomiol. 2017;27(5):1145–8.
    1. Kaye AE, Kaye AJ, Pahk B et al. Sternal wound reconstruction: management in different cardiac populations.Ann Plast Surg 2010May;64(5). PubMed PMID: 20395796. Epub 2010/03/02. - PubMed
    1. Vyas RM, Orgill DP. Reply: transdiaphragmatic omental harvest: a simple, efficient method for sternal wound coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1074. e. PubMed PMID: 24281620. Epub 2013/11/28. - PubMed
    1. Alebrahim K, Al-Ebrahim E, Prevention. Classification and Management Review of Deep Sternal Wound Infection. Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Sep 14;23(5):E652-E7. PubMed PMID: 32990568. Epub 2020/09/30. - PubMed
    1. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting.Am J Infect Control. 2008Jun;36(5):309–32. PubMed PMID: 18538699. Epub 2008/06/10. - PubMed