Deep learning for detection of iso-dense, obscure masses in mammographically dense breasts
- PMID: 37209125
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09717-7
Deep learning for detection of iso-dense, obscure masses in mammographically dense breasts
Erratum in
-
Correction: Deep learning for detection of iso-dense, obscure masses in mammographically dense breasts.Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):8398. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09851-2. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37347431 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the performance of deep learning in isodense/obscure masses in dense breasts. To build and validate a deep learning (DL) model using core radiology principles and analyze its performance in isodense/obscure masses. To show performance on screening mammography as well as diagnostic mammography distribution.
Methods: This was a retrospective, single-institution, multi-centre study with external validation. For model building, we took a 3-pronged approach. First, we explicitly taught the network to learn features other than density differences: such as spiculations and architectural distortion. Second, we used the opposite breast to enable the detection of asymmetries. Third, we systematically enhanced each image by piece-wise-linear transformation. We tested the network on a diagnostic mammography dataset (2569 images with 243 cancers, January to June 2018) and a screening mammography dataset (2146 images with 59 cancers, patient recruitment from January to April 2021) from a different centre (external validation).
Results: When trained with our proposed technique (and compared with baseline network), sensitivity for malignancy increased from 82.7 to 84.7% at 0.2 False positives per image (FPI) in the diagnostic mammography dataset, 67.9 to 73.8% in the subset of patients with dense breasts, 74.6 to 85.3 in the subset of patients with isodense/obscure cancers and 84.9 to 88.7 in an external validation test set with a screening mammography distribution. We showed that our sensitivity exceeded currently reported values (0.90 at 0.2 FPI) on a public benchmark dataset (INBreast).
Conclusion: Modelling traditional mammographic teaching into a DL framework can help improve cancer detection accuracy in dense breasts.
Clinical relevance statement: Incorporating medical knowledge into neural network design can help us overcome some limitations associated with specific modalities. In this paper, we show how one such deep neural network can help improve performance on mammographically dense breasts.
Key points: • Although state-of-the-art deep learning networks achieve good results in cancer detection in mammography in general, isodense, obscure masses and mammographically dense breasts posed a challenge to deep learning networks. • Collaborative network design and incorporation of traditional radiology teaching into the deep learning approach helped mitigate the problem. • The accuracy of deep learning networks may be translatable to different patient distributions. We showed the results of our network on screening as well as diagnostic mammography datasets.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Mammography.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Similar articles
-
Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):6062-6071. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06950-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32524221
-
Performance of DWI as a Rapid Unenhanced Technique for Detecting Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Elevated-Risk Women With Dense Breasts.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jul;207(1):205-16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15873. Epub 2016 Apr 14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016. PMID: 27077731 Free PMC article.
-
Determination of mammographic breast density using a deep convolutional neural network.Br J Radiol. 2019 Jan;92(1093):20180691. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180691. Epub 2018 Oct 1. Br J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30209957 Free PMC article.
-
Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.048. Epub 2014 Jun 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 24959654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Cancer. 2020 Aug;123(4):673-688. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0928-1. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Br J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32528118 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Seely JM, Alhassan T (2018) Screening for breast cancer in 2018-what should we be doing today? Curr Oncol Tor Ont. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3770 - DOI
-
- Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Majid AS, de Paredes ES, Doherty RD, Sharma NR, Salvador X (2003) Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls. Radiographics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.234025083 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Freer PE (2015) Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. Radiographics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.352140106 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Patel MR, Whitman GJ (1998) Negative mammograms in symptomatic patients with breast cancer. Acad Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(98)80008-1 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous