Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jul;41(7):1763-1774.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04412-0. Epub 2023 May 20.

Impact of sex on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney and urothelial cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Impact of sex on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney and urothelial cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Takafumi Yanagisawa et al. World J Urol. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze and summarize the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) alone or in combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) stratified by sex.

Methods: Three databases were queried in October 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing RCC and UC patients treated with ICIs. We analyzed the association between sex and the efficacy of ICIs in RCC and UC patients across several clinical settings. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for the metastatic setting and disease-free survival (DFS) for the adjuvant setting.

Results: Overall, 16 RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. In the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC) and UC (mUC) patients, ICI-based combination therapies significantly improved OS compared to the current standard of care, regardless of sex. Adjuvant ICI monotherapy reduced the risk of disease recurrence in female patients with locally advanced RCC (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.93) but not in male patients, and, conversely, in male patients with muscle-invasive UC (pooled HR: 0.80, 95%CI 0.68-0.94) but not in female patients. Treatment ranking analyses in the first-line treatment of mRCC and mUC showed different results between sexes. Of note, regarding adjuvant treatment for RCC, pembrolizumab (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved DFS in males, whereas atezolizumab (84%) in females.

Conclusions: OS benefit of first-line ICI-based combination therapy was seen in mRCC and mUC patients regardless of sex. Sex-based recommendations for ICI-based regimens according to the clinical setting may help guide clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Adjuvant; Advanced; Gender; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Metastatic; Renal cell carcinoma; Sex; Urothelial carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Takahiro Kimura is a paid consultant/advisor of Astellas, Bayer, Janssen and Sanofi. Shahrokh F. Shariat received follows: Honoraria: Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Ferring, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Olympus, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda Consulting or Advisory Role: Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Ferring, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Olympus, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Takeda Speakers Bureau: Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ferring, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Olympus, Pfizer, Richard Wolf, Roche, Takeda, The other authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plots showing association of survival outcomes and ICI therapy for RCC stratified by sex; OS A and PFS B for 1st-line ICI-based systemic combination therapy, and C DFS for adjuvant ICI therapy for locally advanced RCC
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plots showing association of survival outcomes and ICI therapy for RCC stratified by sex; OS A and PFS B for 1st-line ICI-based systemic combination therapy, and C DFS for adjuvant ICI therapy for locally advanced RCC
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plots and SUCRA graph from NMAs for A OS in mRCC patients treated with 1st-line systemic treatment and B DFS in locally advanced RCC patients treated with adjuvant ICI therapy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots showing association of survival outcomes and ICI therapy for UC stratified by sex; A OS for 1st-line ICI-based systemic combination therapy and B DFS for adjuvant ICI therapy for locally advanced UC

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cathomas R, Lorch A, Bruins HM, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, Efstathiou JA, et al. The 2021 updated European association of urology guidelines on metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2022;81(1):95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update. Eur Urol. 2022;82(4):399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson T, Chang YH, et al. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab after Nephrectomy in Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(8):683–694. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2106391. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, Schenker M, Valderrama BP, Tomita Y, et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2102–2114. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lucca I, Klatte T, Fajkovic H, de Martino M, Shariat SF. Gender differences in incidence and outcomes of urothelial and kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(10):585–592. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.232. - DOI - PubMed

Substances