Influence of the preoperative L5S1 disc state on lateral L2 to L5 fusion's outcomes at an average follow-up of 3,5 years (minimum 2 years)
- PMID: 37209209
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07771-9
Influence of the preoperative L5S1 disc state on lateral L2 to L5 fusion's outcomes at an average follow-up of 3,5 years (minimum 2 years)
Abstract
Introduction: The impact of pre-existing degeneration of a disc underlying a lumbar arthrodesis via lateral approach on long-term clinical outcome has, to our knowledge, not been studied. When performing arthrodesis between L2 and L5, its extension to L5S1 is challenging because it imposes a different surgical approach. Therefore, surgeon's temptation is to not include L5S1 in the fusion even in case of discopathy. Our objective was to study the influence of the preoperative L5S1 status on the clinical outcome of lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) using a pre-psoatic approach between L2 and L5 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Material and methods: Patients who underwent LLIF from L2 to L5 between 2015 and 2020 were included in our study. We studied VAS, ODI, and global clinical outcome before surgery and at last follow-up. The L5-S1 disc was radiologically studied in preoperative imaging. Patients were included in two groups (A "with" and B :without" L5-S1 disc degeneration) to compare the clinical outcomes at last follow-up. Our primary objective was to evaluate the rate of L5-S1 disc revision surgery at last follow-up.
Results: 102 patients were included. 2 required L5-S1 disc surgery following overlying arthrodesis. Our results showed a significant improvement in the patients' clinical outcomes at the last follow-up (p < 0.0001). We did not find any significant difference on clinical criteria between groups A & B.
Conclusion: A preop L5S1 disc degeneration does not seem to impact the final clinical outcomes after lumbar lateral interbody fusion at a minimal two years F.U. It should not be systematically involved in an overlying fusion.
Keywords: Degenerative disc disease; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF); Lateral spine approach; Lumbar arthrodesis; Pre-existing disc degeneration.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Guigui P, Wodecki P, Bizot P, Lambert P, Chaumeil G, Deburge A (2000) Influence à long terme de l’arthrodèse associée sur les niveaux adjacents dans le traitement des sténoses lombaires [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 86(6):546–557 - PubMed
-
- Gillet P (2003) The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. Spine 28:338–345 - DOI
-
- Mannion AF, Leivseth G, Brox JI, Fritzell P, Hagg O, Fairbank JC (2014) ISSLS prize winner: long-term follow-up suggests spinal fusion is associated with increased adjacent segment disc degeneration but without influence on clinical outcome: results of a combined follow-up from 4 randomized controlled trials. Spine 39(17):1373–1783 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Xia XP, Chen HL, Cheng HB (2013) Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 38(7):597–608. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a2ea - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
