Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;27(12):1257-1263.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4. Epub 2023 May 20.

Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Affiliations

Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis

C Clancy et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who underwent primary IPAA with ileostomy reversal between 2000 and 2021 from a Pouch Registry were stratified on the basis of timing of reversal. Those reversed before 8 weeks (early) and those reversed from 8 weeks to 116 days (routine) were compared. The primary outcome was overall complications according to timing and reason for closure.

Results: Ileostomy reversal was performed early in 92 patients and routinely in 1908. Median time to closure was 49 days in the early group and 93 days in the routine group. Reasons for early reversal were stoma-related morbidity in 43.3% (n = 39) and scheduled closure in 56.7% (n = 51). The complication rate in the early group was 17.4% versus 11% in the routine group (p = 0.085). When early patients were stratified according to reason for reversal, those reversed early for stoma-related morbidity had an increased complication rate compared to the routine group (25.6% vs. 11%, p = 0.006). Patients undergoing scheduled reversal in the early group did not have increased complications (11.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.9). There was a higher likelihood of pouch anastomotic leak when reversal was performed early for stoma complications compared to routinely (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.01-16.57, p = 0.049).

Conclusions: Early closure is safe but could be delayed in stoma morbidity as patients may experience increased complications.

Keywords: Closure; Ileal pouch anal anastomosis; Ileostomy; Reversal; Timing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al (2013) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg 257:679–685 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sahami S, Bartels SA, D’Hoore A et al (2016) A multicentre evaluation of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 10(7):773–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heuschen U, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH et al (2002) Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 235:207–216 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Heuthorst L, Wasmann KATGM, Reijntjes MA, Hompes R, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA (2021) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and pouch failure. Ann Surg Open 2(2):e074. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000074 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Canonico S, Selvaggi F (2012) Role of ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. World J Gastroenterol 18(15):1703–1707. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i15.1703 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources