Simplifying Retroperitoneal Robotic Single-port Surgery: Novel Supine Anterior Retroperitoneal Access
- PMID: 37211448
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.006
Simplifying Retroperitoneal Robotic Single-port Surgery: Novel Supine Anterior Retroperitoneal Access
Abstract
Background: Multiport robotic surgery in the retroperitoneum is limited by the bulky robotic frame and clashing of instruments. Moreover, patients are placed in the lateral decubitus position, which has been linked to complications.
Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of a supine anterior retroperitoneal access (SARA) technique with the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robotic platform.
Design, setting, and participants: Between October 2022 and January 2023, 18 patients underwent surgery using the SARA technique for renal cancer, urothelial cancer, or ureteral stenosis. Perioperative variables were prospectively collected and outcomes were assessed.
Surgical procedure: With the patient in a supine position, a 3-cm incision is made at the McBurney point and the abdominal muscles are dissected. Finger dissection is used to develop the retroperitoneal space for the da Vinci SP access port. After docking, the first step is to dissect retroperitoneal tissue to reveal the psoas muscle. This allows identification of the ureter, the inferior renal pole, and the hilum.
Measurements: A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Data collected included demographics, operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), surgical margin status, complications, length of hospital stay, 30-d Clavien-Dindo complications, and postoperative narcotic use.
Results and limitations: Twelve patients underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) and two each underwent pyeloplasty, radical nephroureterectomy, and radical nephrectomy. In the PN group, mean age was 57 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 30-73), median body mass index was 32 kg/m2 (IQR 17-58), and 25% had stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease. The median Charlson comorbidity index was 3 (IQR 0-7) and 75% of PN patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3. The median RENAL score was 5 (IQR 4-7). The median WIT was 25 min (IQR 16-48) and the median tumor size was 35 mm (IQR 16-50). The median estimated blood loss was 105 ml (IQR 20-400) and the median operative time was 160 min (IQR 110-200). Positive surgical margins were found in one patient. In the overall cohort, one patient was readmitted and managed conservatively; 83% of the PN group were discharged on the same day as their surgery, with the remainder discharged the next day. At 7 d after surgery, no patients reported narcotic use.
Conclusions: The SARA approach is feasible and safe. Larger studies are needed to confirm this approach as a one-step solution for upper urinary tract surgery.
Patient summary: We assessed initial outcomes of a novel approach for accessing the retroperitoneum (the space behind the abdominal cavity and in front of the back muscles and spine) during robot-assisted surgery in the upper urinary tract. The patient is placed on their back and surgery is performed with a single-port robot. Our results show that this approach was feasible and safe, with low complication rates, less postoperative pain, and earlier discharge. This is a promising start, but larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Keywords: Retroperitoneal surgery; Robotic surgery; Single port; Supine positioning.
Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2741-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z. Epub 2013 Mar 14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23494081
-
Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.029. Epub 2009 Jan 7. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19185415
-
Single-Port robot assisted partial nephrectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci Single-Port platform (IDEAL Phase 1).Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;74(2):216-224. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.03919-9. Epub 2021 Mar 26. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 33769009 Review.
-
Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study.Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.028. Epub 2014 May 22. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24857539
-
Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.J Endourol. 2018 Jul;32(7):591-596. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0211. Epub 2018 May 29. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 29695171
Cited by
-
Robot-assisted Surgery in the Field of Urology: The Most Pioneering Approaches 2015-2023.Res Rep Urol. 2023 Oct 9;15:453-470. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S386025. eCollection 2023. Res Rep Urol. 2023. PMID: 37842031 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single-port robot-assisted nephroureterectomy via a supine anterior approach: step-by-step technique.BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):535-538. doi: 10.1111/bju.16537. Epub 2024 Oct 3. BJU Int. 2025. PMID: 39360662 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The impact of single-port robotic surgery: a survey among urology residents and fellows in the United States.J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 14;18(1):369. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02120-4. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 39402405
-
Comparison of lateral flank approach and low anterior access for single port (SP) retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: an analysis from the single port advanced research consortium (SPARC).J Robot Surg. 2024 May 18;18(1):216. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01969-9. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38761306
-
Narrative Review of Single-Port Surgery in Genitourinary Cancers.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;17(3):334. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030334. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39941706 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical