Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;50(1):15-23.
doi: 10.1111/jorc.12468. Epub 2023 May 22.

Value of patient decision aids for shared decision-making in kidney failure

Affiliations

Value of patient decision aids for shared decision-making in kidney failure

Anita van Eck van der Sluijs et al. J Ren Care. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: It is unknown how often Dutch patient decision aids are used during kidney failure treatment modality education and what their impact is on shared decision-making.

Objectives: We determined the use of Three Good Questions, 'Overviews of options', and Dutch Kidney Guide by kidney healthcare professionals. Also, we determined patient-experienced shared decision-making. Finally, we determined whether the experience of shared decision-making among patients changed after a training workshop for healthcare professionals.

Design: Quality improvement study.

Participants: Healthcare professionals answered questionnaires regarding education/patient decision aids. Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 completed shared decision-making questionnaires. Data were analysed with one-way analysis of variance and linear regression.

Results: Of 117 healthcare professionals, 56% applied shared decision-making by discussing Three Good Questions (28%), 'Overviews of options' (31%-33%) and Kidney Guide (51%). Of 182 patients, 61%-85% was satisfied with their education. Of worst scoring hospitals regarding shared decision-making, only 50% used 'Overviews of options'/Kidney Guide. Of best scoring hospitals 100% used them, needed less conversations (p = 0.05), provided information about all treatment options and more often provided information at home. After the workshop, patients' shared decision-making scores remained unchanged.

Conclusions: The use of specifically developed patient decision aids during kidney failure treatment modality education is limited. Hospitals that did use them had higher shared decision-making scores. However, the degree of shared decision-making experienced by patients remained unchanged after healthcare professionals were trained on shared decision-making and the implementation of patient decision aids.

Keywords: education process; kidney failure; patient decision aids; quality improvement; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bonenkamp, A.A., Reijnders, T.D.Y., van Eck van der Sluijs, A., Hagen, E.C., Abrahams, A.C., Van Ittersum, F.J. et al. (2021) Key elements in selection of pre-dialysis patients for home dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 41, 494-501.
    1. Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO). Available from: https://english.ccmo.nl/investigators/legal-framework-for-medical-scient... [Accessed 1st January 2023).
    1. Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T. (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine (1982), 44, 681-692.
    1. Dahlerus, C., Quinn, M., Messersmith, E., Lachance, L., Subramanian, L., Perry, E. et al. (2016) Patient perspectives on the choice of dialysis modality: results from the empowering patients on choices for renal replacement therapy (EPOCH-RRT) study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 68, 901-910.
    1. Dutch Kidney Guide. Available from: https://nierwijzer.nl/ [Accessed 18th November 2021].

LinkOut - more resources