Relationship between depression, anxiety, stress, and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a longitudinal study
- PMID: 37213392
- PMCID: PMC10197902
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116566
Relationship between depression, anxiety, stress, and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a longitudinal study
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to (1) describe the course of the emotional burden (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress) in a general population sample during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and 2021 and (2) explore the association between emotional burden and a serologically proven infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Study design: This longitudinal study involved a sample of community-dwelling persons aged ≥14 years from the general population of South Tyrol (Province of Bolzano-Bozen, Northern Italy). Data were collected at two stages over a 1-year period in 2020 and 2021.
Methods: Persons were invited to participate in a survey on socio-demographic, health-related and psychosocial variables (e.g., age, chronic diseases, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, DASS-21), as well as in the serological testing for of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulins.
Results: In 2020, 855 (23.8%) out of 3,600 persons participated; in 2021, 305 (35.7%) out of 855 were tested again. We observed a statistically significant decrease in mean DASS-21 scores for depression, stress, and total scores between 2020 and 2021, yet not for anxiety. Persons with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection between the first and second data collection exhibited increased emotional burden compared to those without SARS-CoV-2-infection. The odds of participants with a self-reported diagnosis of mental disorder for future infection with SARS-CoV-2 was almost four times higher than that of participants without mental disorders (OR:3.75; 95%CI:1.79-7.83).
Conclusion: Our findings support to the hypothesis of a psycho-neuroendocrine-immune interplay in COVID-19. Further research is necessary to explore the mechanisms underlying the interplay between mental health and SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; anxiety; depression; emotional burden; longitudinal study; stress.
Copyright © 2023 Ausserhofer, Mahlknecht, Engl, Piccoliori, Pfitscher, Silbernagl, Giacomoni, Pycha, Lombardo, Gärtner, Mian, Meier, Wiedermann and Keim.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
-
- Alimoradi Z., Broström A., Tsang H. W. H., Griffiths M. D., Haghayegh S., Ohayon M. M., et al. . (2021). Sleep problems during COVID-19 pandemic and its' association to psychological distress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 36:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100916, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Antony M. M., Bieling P. J., Cox B. J., Enns M. W., Swinson R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol. Assess. 10, 176–181. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 - DOI
-
- ASTAT (2020). “Erhebung über Covid-19 in Südtirol – Juli 2020” in Astatinfo Nr 52 (Landesinstitut für Statistik; ). Available at: https://astat.provinz.bz.it/de/aktuelles-publikationen-info.asp?news_act... (Accessed June 19, 2022).
-
- Bottesi G., Ghisi M., Altoè G., Conforti E., Melli G., Sica C. (2015). The Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples. Compr. Psychiatry 60, 170–181. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.04.005, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
