Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 5:11:1096246.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1096246. eCollection 2023.

Developing a peer-led intervention to promote COVID-19 testing in low-income housing settings

Affiliations

Developing a peer-led intervention to promote COVID-19 testing in low-income housing settings

Andrew D Plunk et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The Housing Collaborative project at Eastern Virginia Medical School has developed a method of adapting public health guidance from public housing communities, which face tremendous health challenges in cardiometabolic health, cancer, and other major health conditions. In this paper, we describe how academic and community partners in the Housing Collaborative came together to do this work with a focus on COVID-19 testing in the context of the emerging pandemic.

Methods: The academic team used virtual community engagement methods to interact with the Housing Collaborative Community Advisory Board (HCCAB) and a separate cohort of research participants (N = 102) recruited into a study of distrust in COVID-19 guidance. We conducted a series of 44 focus group interviews with participants on related topics. Results from these interviews were discussed with the HCCAB. We used the collaborative intervention planning framework to inform adaptation of public health guidance on COVID-19 testing delivered in low-income housing settings by including all relevant perspectives.

Results: Participants reported several important barriers to COVID-19 testing related to distrust in the tests and those administering them. Distrust in housing authorities and how they might misuse positive test results seemed to further undermine decision making about COVID-19 testing. Pain associated with testing was also a concern. To address these concerns, a peer-led testing intervention was proposed by the Housing Collaborative. A second round of focus group interviews was then conducted, in which participants reported their approval of the proposed intervention.

Conclusion: Although the COVID-19 pandemic was not our initial focus, we were able to identify a number of barriers to COVID-19 testing in low-income housing settings that can be addressed with adapted public health guidance. We struck a balance between community input and scientific rigor and obtained high quality, honest feedback to inform evidence-based recommendations to guide decisions about health.

Keywords: COVID-19; community-based participatory research; distrust; public housing; testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Minkler M. Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; (1997).
    1. Ahmed S, Beck B, Maurana C, Newton G. Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools. Educ Health Change Learn Pract. (2004) 17:141–51. doi: 10.1080/13576280410001710969, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krieger J, Allen C, Cheadle A, Ciske S, Schier J, Senturia K, et al. . Using community-based participatory research to address social determinants of health: lessons learned from Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities. Health Educ Behav. (2002) 29:361–82. doi: 10.1177/109019810202900307, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross LF, Loup A, Nelson RM, Botkin JR, Kost R, Smith GR, et al. . The challenges of collaboration for academic and Community Partners in a Research Partnership: points to consider. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. (2010) 5:19–31. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abrams MP, Salzman J, Espina Rey A, Daly K. Impact of providing peer support on medical students’ empathy, self-efficacy, and mental health stigma. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:5135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095135, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types