Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;27(5):374-376.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24464.

Simplified Legal Procedure for End-of-life Decisions in India: A New Dawn in the Care of the Dying?

Raj Kumar Mani  1 , Srinagesh Simha  2 , Roopkumar Gursahani  3
Affiliations

Simplified Legal Procedure for End-of-life Decisions in India: A New Dawn in the Care of the Dying?

Raj Kumar Mani et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 May.

Abstract

Recent amendments to the onerous legal procedure laid down in the Landmark Supreme Court Judgment Common Cause vs The Union of India have aroused widespread interest. The new procedural guidelines of January 2023 appear workable and should ease ethical decision-making toward the end-of-life in India. This commentary provides the backdrop to the evolution of legal provisions for advance directives, withdrawal, and withholding decisions in terminal care.

How to cite this article: Mani RK, Simha S, Gursahani R. Simplified Legal Procedure for End-of-life Decisions in India: A New Dawn in the Care of the Dying? Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(5):374-376.

Keywords: Advance care planning; Comfort care; End-of-life care; End-of-life care foregoing of life support; Intensive care unit; Medical ethics; Medico legal issues; Palliative care; Withdrawal and withholding ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: Dr Raj Kumar Mani is associated as the National Editorial Board member of this journal and this manuscript was subjected to this journal's standard review procedures, with this peer review handled independently of this editorial board member and his research group.

Figures

Flowchart 1
Flowchart 1
Summary of the SC's legal guidelines for decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mani RK. Coming together to care for the dying in India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:560–562. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.140139. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piers RD, Azoulay E, Ricou B, Ganz DF, Decruyenaere J, Max A, et al. APPROPRICUS Study Group of the Ethics Section of the ESICM. Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians. JAMA. 2011;306:2694–2703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1888. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sallnow L, Smith R, Ahmedzai SH, Bhadelia A, Chamberlain C, Cong Y, et al. Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: Bringing death back into life. Lancet. 2022;399:837–884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02314-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benoit DD, Jensen HI, Malmgren J, Metaxa V, Reyners AK, Darmon M. DISPROPRICUS study group of the Ethics Section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Outcome in patients perceived as receiving excessive care across different ethical climates: A prospective study in 68 intensive care units in Europe and the USA. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(7):1039–1049. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5231-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nin Vaeza N, Martin Delgado MC, Heras La Calle G. Humanizing intensive care: Toward a Human-Centered Care ICU Model. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:385–390. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004191. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources