The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care
- PMID: 37215676
- PMCID: PMC10196497
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087045
The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care
Abstract
The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson in June 2022 reversed precedent which had previously protected abortion prior to fetal viability as a universal right within the United States. This decision almost immediately led to abortion restrictions across 25 states. The resulting lack of access to abortion care for millions of pregnant people will have profound physical and mental health consequences, the full effects of which will not be realized for years to come. Approximately 1 in 5 women access abortions in the U.S. each year. These women are diverse and represent all American groups. The Supreme court decision, however, will affect populations that have and continue to be marginalized the most. Forcing pregnant individuals to carry unwanted pregnancies worsens health outcomes and mortality risk for both the perinatal individual and the offspring. The US has one of the highest maternal mortality rates and this rate is projected to increase with abortion bans. Abortion policies also interfere with appropriate medical care of pregnant people leading to less safe pregnancies for all. Beyond the physical morbidity, the psychological sequelae of carrying a forced pregnancy to term will lead to an even greater burden of maternal mental illness, exacerbating the already existing maternal mental health crisis. This perspective piece reviews the current evidence of abortion denial on women's mental health and care. Based on the current evidence, we discuss the clinical, educational, societal, research, and policy implications of the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court decision.
Keywords: Dobbs v Jackson; Roe v Wade; abortion; mental health; obstetrics and gynecology; perinatal; psychiatry; reproduction.
Copyright © 2023 Londoño Tobón, McNicholas, Clare, Ireland, Payne, Moore Simas, Scott, Becker and Byatt.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Potential Effects of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health on Civil Commitment Law.Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):359-373. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.37. Epub 2024 Feb 12. Am J Law Med. 2023. PMID: 38344784
-
Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.Cureus. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e32100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32100. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36601141 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 1;140(2):146-149. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004832. Epub 2022 Apr 27. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35852261
-
Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.Womens Midlife Health. 2023 Jan 6;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40695-022-00085-8. Womens Midlife Health. 2023. PMID: 36609311 Free PMC article.
-
The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US.Occup Health Sci. 2023;7(1):1-37. doi: 10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1. Epub 2023 Feb 20. Occup Health Sci. 2023. PMID: 36843836 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Putting Politics Aside: Supporting Pregnant Women Who Have Experienced Sexual Violence.Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Jan;22(1):72-76. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20230030. Epub 2024 Jan 12. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024. PMID: 38694154 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.JAMIA Open. 2025 May 2;8(3):ooaf031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031. eCollection 2025 Jun. JAMIA Open. 2025. PMID: 40322632 Free PMC article.
-
Fluctuating recovery: Trajectories of young adult mental health through the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2022.J Affect Disord. 2025 Nov 15;389:119694. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119694. Epub 2025 Jun 16. J Affect Disord. 2025. PMID: 40532882
-
Decrease in reproductive desires among non-parent heterosexual women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland: the role of epidemiological stress, socioeconomic status, and reproductive rights.Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1462215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1462215. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40109425 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jones RK, Witwer E, Jerman J. AbortiPon incidence and service availability in the United States. New York: Guttmacher Institute; (2019).
-
- Walensky RP, Bunnell R, Layden J, Kent CK, Gottardy AJ, Leahy MA, et al. . Morbidity and mortality weekly report Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MMWR editorial and production staff (serials) MMWR editorial board. (2019).
-
- Resneck J. Dobbs rPuling is an assault on reproductive health, safe medical practice. (2022) available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/dobbs-ruling-assault-reproduct.... (Accessed December 10, 2022).
-
- American Psychiatric Association . American Psychiatric Association statement on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s health Organization (2022) available at: https://www.psychiatry.org/News-room/News-Releases/APA-Statement-on-Dobb.... (Accessed December 10, 2022).
-
- Hoskins IA. ACOG statement on the decision in Dobbs V. Jackson (2022) available at: https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2022/06/acog-statement-on-the-de.... (Accessed December 10, 2022).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources