Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 5:14:1087045.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087045. eCollection 2023.

The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care

Affiliations

The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care

Amalia Londoño Tobón et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson in June 2022 reversed precedent which had previously protected abortion prior to fetal viability as a universal right within the United States. This decision almost immediately led to abortion restrictions across 25 states. The resulting lack of access to abortion care for millions of pregnant people will have profound physical and mental health consequences, the full effects of which will not be realized for years to come. Approximately 1 in 5 women access abortions in the U.S. each year. These women are diverse and represent all American groups. The Supreme court decision, however, will affect populations that have and continue to be marginalized the most. Forcing pregnant individuals to carry unwanted pregnancies worsens health outcomes and mortality risk for both the perinatal individual and the offspring. The US has one of the highest maternal mortality rates and this rate is projected to increase with abortion bans. Abortion policies also interfere with appropriate medical care of pregnant people leading to less safe pregnancies for all. Beyond the physical morbidity, the psychological sequelae of carrying a forced pregnancy to term will lead to an even greater burden of maternal mental illness, exacerbating the already existing maternal mental health crisis. This perspective piece reviews the current evidence of abortion denial on women's mental health and care. Based on the current evidence, we discuss the clinical, educational, societal, research, and policy implications of the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court decision.

Keywords: Dobbs v Jackson; Roe v Wade; abortion; mental health; obstetrics and gynecology; perinatal; psychiatry; reproduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jones RK, Witwer E, Jerman J. AbortiPon incidence and service availability in the United States. New York: Guttmacher Institute; (2019).
    1. Walensky RP, Bunnell R, Layden J, Kent CK, Gottardy AJ, Leahy MA, et al. . Morbidity and mortality weekly report Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MMWR editorial and production staff (serials) MMWR editorial board. (2019).
    1. Resneck J. Dobbs rPuling is an assault on reproductive health, safe medical practice. (2022) available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/dobbs-ruling-assault-reproduct.... (Accessed December 10, 2022).
    1. American Psychiatric Association . American Psychiatric Association statement on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s health Organization (2022) available at: https://www.psychiatry.org/News-room/News-Releases/APA-Statement-on-Dobb.... (Accessed December 10, 2022).
    1. Hoskins IA. ACOG statement on the decision in Dobbs V. Jackson (2022) available at: https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2022/06/acog-statement-on-the-de.... (Accessed December 10, 2022).

LinkOut - more resources