Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 22;18(5):e0286094.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286094. eCollection 2023.

Efficacy and safety of different antimicrobial DURATions for the treatment of Infections associated with Osteosynthesis Material implanted after long bone fractures (DURATIOM): Protocol for a randomized, pragmatic trial

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of different antimicrobial DURATions for the treatment of Infections associated with Osteosynthesis Material implanted after long bone fractures (DURATIOM): Protocol for a randomized, pragmatic trial

Carmen Garrigós et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Infection associated with osteosynthesis material (IOM) is one of the most feared and challenging complications of trauma surgery and can cause significant functional loss, requiring multiple interventions and excessive consumption of antimicrobials. Evidence is needed about the best surgical procedure and the duration of antibiotic treatment according to the age of the implant or onset of infection symptoms, as it considers the biofilm formation and the state of fracture healing. There were not clinical trials evaluating the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in IOM when implant is retained. Because there are antibiotics that have proven to be effective for the treatment of infection associated to implant, mainly in PJI, these antibiotics could be used in these infections. Investigating whether shorter duration of treatment is a priority in infectious diseases, as a way to reduce the exposure to antibiotics and help in controlling antimicrobial resistance and avoiding unnecessary adverse events and cost. We aim to describe the hypothesis, objectives, design, variables and procedures for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing different durations of antibiotic treatment in IOM after long bone fractures treated with debridement and implant retention.

Methods and design: This is a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled, pragmatic phase 3 trial, comparing different durations of antibiotic treatment in IOM after long bone fractures treated with debridement and implant retention. Patients with microbiologically confirmed IOM will be included. Eligible patients are those older than 14 years, with early IOM (up to 2 weeks after the implant surgery) and delayed IOM (between 3 and 10 weeks after the implant surgery) with stabilized fracture and absence of bone exposure who sign the informed consent. Randomization will be 1:1 to receive a short-term antibiotic treatment (8 weeks in early IOM and 12 weeks in delayed IOM) or a long-term antibiotic treatment (12 weeks in early IOM or until fracture healing or implant removal in delayed IOM). The antibiotic treatment will be that used in routine practice by the specialist in infectious diseases. The primary outcome is the composited variable "cure" that includes clinical cure, radiological healing, and definitive soft tissue coverage, which will be evaluated in the test of cure at 12 months after the end of antibiotic therapy. Adverse events, resistance development during therapy and functional status will be collected. A total of 364 patients are needed to show a 10% non-inferiority margin, with 80% power and 5% one-sided significance level.

Discussion: If the hypothesis of non-inferiority of short vs. long antibiotic treatments is demonstrated, and the efficacy of antibiotics with less ecological impact in long treatments, the impact on reduction of bacterial resistance, toxicity and health costs will be observed.

Trial registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05294796) on Jan 26th 2022 and at the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EUDRACT) (2021-003914-38) on Jul 16th 2021. The Sponsor Study Code is DURATIOM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Visits and follow-up of participants of DURATIOM trial.
The total follow-up time will be one year after completing the antibiotic treatment prescribed after randomization. Patients with delayed infections randomized to the long-treatment regimen (until fracture union) who had undergone 6 months or more of antibiotic treatment will be evaluated 18 months after the start of treatment (or randomization).

References

    1. Bezstarosti H, Van Lieshout EMM, Voskamp LW, Kortram K, Obremskey W, McNally MA, et al.. Insights into treatment and outcome of fracture-related infection: a systematic literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(1):61–72. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3048-0 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Metsemakers WJ, Kuehl R, Moriarty TF, Richards RG, Verhofstad MHJ, Borens O, et al.. Infection after fracture fixation: Current surgical and microbiological concepts. Injury. 2018;49(3):511–522. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.019 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with fracture-fixation devices. Injury. 2006;37 Suppl 2:S59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.010 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgenstern M, Erichsen C, von Rüden C, Metsemakers WJ, Kates SL, Moriarty TF, et al.. Staphylococcal orthopaedic device-related infections in older patients. Injury. 2016;47(7):1427–34. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.027 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metsemakers WJ, Smeets B, Nijs S, Hoekstra H. Infection after fracture fixation of the tibia: Analysis of healthcare utilization and related costs. Injury. 2017;48(6):1204–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.030 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data