Consent and refusal of procedures during labour and birth: a survey among 11 418 women in the Netherlands
- PMID: 37217317
- PMCID: PMC11287523
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015538
Consent and refusal of procedures during labour and birth: a survey among 11 418 women in the Netherlands
Abstract
Background: Informed consent for medical interventions is ethically and legally required; an important aspect of quality and safety in healthcare; and essential to person-centred care. During labour and birth, respecting consent requirements, including respecting refusal, can contribute to a higher sense of choice and control for labouring women. This study examines (1) to what extent and for which procedures during labour and birth women report that consent requirements were not met and/or inadequate information was provided, (2) how frequently women consider consent requirements not being met upsetting and (3) which personal characteristics are associated with the latter.
Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Netherlands among women who gave birth up to 5 years previously. Respondents were recruited through social media with the help of influencers and organisations. The survey focused on 10 common procedures during labour and birth, investigating for each procedure if respondents were offered the procedure, if they consented or refused, if the information provision was sufficient and if they underwent unconsented procedures, whether they found this upsetting.
Results: 13 359 women started the survey and 11 418 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Consent not asked was most often reported by respondents who underwent postpartum oxytocin (47.5%) and episiotomy (41.7%). Refusal was most often over-ruled when performing augmentation of labour (2.2%) and episiotomy (1.9%). Information provision was reported inadequate more often when consent requirements were not met compared with when they were met. Multiparous women had decreased odds of reporting unmet consent requirements compared with primiparous (adjusted ORs 0.54-0.85). There was considerable variation across procedures in how frequently not meeting consent requirements was considered upsetting.
Conclusions: Consent for performing a procedure is frequently absent in Dutch maternity care. In some instances, procedures were performed in spite of the woman's refusal. More awareness is needed on meeting necessary consent requirements in order to achieve person-centred and high-quality care during labour and birth.
Keywords: healthcare quality improvement; obstetrics and gynecology; patient-centred care; shared decision making; womens health.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Consent for interventions during childbirth: A national population-based study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;168(1):333-342. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15830. Epub 2024 Aug 2. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39092580 Free PMC article.
-
Experienced disrespect & abuse during childbirth and associated birth characteristics: a cross-sectional survey in the Netherlands.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06360-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38424515 Free PMC article.
-
Disrespect and abuse during labour and birth amongst 12,239 women in the Netherlands: a national survey.Reprod Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01460-4. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 35804419 Free PMC article.
-
[Woman's information and consent in obstetrics: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):986-993. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30385356 French.
-
Women's views and experiences of augmentation of labour with synthetic oxytocin infusion: A qualitative evidence synthesis.Midwifery. 2023 Jan;116:103512. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103512. Epub 2022 Oct 8. Midwifery. 2023. PMID: 36323076 Review.
Cited by
-
Health workers' perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn health care around the time of childbirth: Results of the Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the EURO Region (IMAgiNE EURO) project in 12 countries of the World Health Organization European Region.J Glob Health. 2024 Sep 6;14:04164. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04164. J Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 39238363 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shroud waving self-determination: A qualitative analysis of the moral and epistemic dimensions of obstetric violence in the Netherlands.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 22;19(4):e0297968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297968. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38648219 Free PMC article.
-
Consent for interventions during childbirth: A national population-based study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;168(1):333-342. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15830. Epub 2024 Aug 2. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39092580 Free PMC article.
-
Experienced disrespect & abuse during childbirth and associated birth characteristics: a cross-sectional survey in the Netherlands.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06360-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38424515 Free PMC article.
-
The ethics of consent during labour and birth: episiotomies.J Med Ethics. 2023 Sep;49(9):611-617. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108601. Epub 2023 Jan 30. J Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 36717252 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. USA: Oxford University Press, 2001.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous