Quality assessment of polymer materials for human model eye development
- PMID: 37217809
- DOI: 10.1007/s10792-023-02736-9
Quality assessment of polymer materials for human model eye development
Abstract
Purpose: We developed model eyes using six polymer materials to determine which materials were most appropriate in simulating real human sclera and extraocular muscle (EOM).
Methods: Five three-dimensional (3-D) printed polymers (FlexFill, PolyFlex, PCTPE, Soft PLA, and NinjaFlex) and one silicone material were systematically tested by board-certified ophthalmologists and senior ophthalmology residents. Material testing included scleral passes with 6-0 Vicryl sutures through each eye model. Participants completed a survey designed to collect demographic data, subjective assessment of each material's accuracy in simulating real human sclera and EOM, and a ranking for each polymer material to identify which would be most suitable for an ophthalmic surgery training tool. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of ranks between the polymer materials.
Results: The distribution of ranks for silicone material's "sclera" and "EOM" components were statistically significantly higher than that of all other polymer materials (all p < 0.05). Silicone material received the highest rank for both "sclera" and "EOM" components. Survey results indicated that the silicone material effectively simulated real human tissue.
Conclusion: Silicone model eyes performed better than 3-D printed polymers as an educational tool for incorporation into a microsurgical training curriculum. Silicone models provide a low-cost teaching tool that allows for independent practice of microsurgical techniques without requiring a wet-laboratory facility.
Keywords: Model eye; Ophthalmology surgical education; Ophthalmology training; Surgical curriculum; Surgical skills; Three-dimensional.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Nakashizuka H, Wakatsuki Y, Machida Y et al (2017) Wet laboratory training using porcine eyes with eyelids. Can J Ophthalmol 52(4):398–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.01.007 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pujari A, Basheer S, Rakheja V et al (2019) Extraocular muscle surgery on goats’ eye: an inexpensive technique to enhance residents’ surgical skills. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(10):1688–1689. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_89_19 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Sommer AC, Blumenthal EZ (2019) Implementations of 3D printing in ophthalmology. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257(9):1815–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04312-3 - DOI
-
- Xie P, Hu Z, Zhang X et al (2014) Application of 3-dimensional printing technology to construct an eye model for fundus viewing study. PLoS ONE 9(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109373 - DOI
-
- Phan CM, Walther H, Qiao H, Shinde R, Jones L (2019) Development of an eye model with a physiological blink mechanism. Transl Vis Sci Technol 8(5):1. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.5.1 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources